THOMAS-COLLOQUIUMS

Bio Fuel Conspiracy

2008-03-15T08:26:00.000-07:00

I am not traditionally a "conspiracy theorist" per se, but I am beginning to have my senses tingle a bit. I am, as most people, beginning to be annoyed with the sudden spike in gas costs. There are just too many elements converging all at once for my sensitivities. Notice, all the present talk and cultural obsessions are driven by the governments assessment of "global warming" (Al Gore), and the governments solution is "bio-fuel" (ethanol). Thus, the government decides to fund (with tax payers dollars) farms that will grow corn for fuel. Unfortunately for them not many people are buying cars that drive on ethanol. So, what do they do next? They are stuck investing money into a product that is expensive to make and drives the prices of many goods and services up in other areas, such as groceries and restaurants, making it hard on everyday people to function. Well, the solution is to drive up cost of fuel. If fuel costs rise and enough media push the need for bio fuel, acting as though it is the only answer, then people will buy it! They keep spreading out the recession word about the economy right up the cusp of talking about fuel prices which then naturally leads people to look for answers. The answer according to the media, Al Gore, and a host of liberals is Ethanol!
So you tell me, is the extended raising of gas prices working in tandem with the push for bio fuels? And if so does that mean that we are being manipulated by the powers that be (once again) in order to accomplish their goals? Is the government in bed with the Gas industry?

Food for thought.

Listening to the Prophets

2008-03-08T08:37:00.000-08:00

I told you a while ago that I was going to comment on both "everyday theology" (vanhoozer), and "Prayer and The Knowledge of God" (Goldsworthy). Well, I did comment on Goldsworthy, but, well, I got kind of bored with Vanhoozer's student essays. Anyway, I picked up "A Christian Manifesto" by Francis Shaeffer in the meantime. The book was very interesting. I have yet to read a book quite like it. The book was basically a call to arms for Christian activists. He writes about how humanism is THE competing worldview against Christianity. His cry is that God's people must stand up against this Darwinian satanic worldview which has infected all areas of life and freedom. His main attack is centered upon law and government, which he sees as the ultimate betrayer of human meaning and existence. He thinks (and rightfully so) that those who are in power are saturated with humanism and thus base law and governance upon its amoral objectives. Simply put, if man is nothing more than material energy without a higher authority to which he is ultimately accountable than the pursuit of his personal happiness is not only his right, but also his duty. For Shaeffer, humanism's greatest danger is that it places man above law. Thus, he can change it without moral reflection or accountability. This is why, says Shaeffer, we have abortion being legalized.

He goes onto talk about how Christians should stand and fight against such moral outrage. Christians should deny obedience to such governance and those who try to suppress the truth of God's law.

I could not help but to think as I read that I was reading a type of Jeremiah or Isaiah. The book was very foretelling about the condition of America, especially seeing as how the book was written in 1981. He was spot on with what America would be like in the future if evangelicals do not stand in opposition to the government. Again, abortion was his main issue. All in all, I really liked the book and it has given me MUCH to think about and wrestle over.

The man was a great philosophical theologian and I admire him greatly.

A moment with Graeme

2008-02-12T17:37:00.000-08:00

"All that the Old Testament teaches about the activity of God, and about the roles of the covenant functionaries (prophets, priests, and kings), can only have relevance to us because it is fulfilled in Jesus to whom we are then united by faith."

Prayer and the Knowledge of God, p 159

Pray like this

2008-02-07T16:57:00.000-08:00

Here is just a taste of the excellent insight into and theology of prayer that Greame Goldsworthy offers in his book "Prayer and the Knowledge of God". I have been feasting at the table of Goldsworthy for about 3yrs now and I have been richly challenged and blessed. I have come to think that he more than any other theologian has changed and expanded my handling of the Scripture.

"The image of God in humankind is exemplified in the incarnate Word of God, Jesus. This Word and image of God is the faithful and true recipient of God's word and the true responder to that word in prayer. As those who are "in Christ" we also respond to the word in prayer. As we do this we know that the weakness and sinfully tainted nature of our prayer is justified by the perfect praying of Jesus as our perfect human representative. God graciously accounts us as acceptable in all respects as Jesus is.
We need to remind ourselves that God accepts the prayers of Christians, not because they are 'good and godly', but because Jesus himself is the true word of prayer on our behalf (p109-110)."

Trying to process and make sense

2008-02-01T17:27:00.000-08:00

This is not an "attack ad". Please, I am not trying to attack or fight anything. I am however, trying to explain what I am beginning to, at least I think, understand. I am referring to the word "separate". I understand the word "separate" to refer to an action, that is, something or someone separating from something or someone else. I also am beginning to understand the word separate to refer to an "ideology". That is, when I say that "I am not a "separatist" the reply cannot simply be "everyone separates from someone" thus making me seem self-contradictory. While that is certainly true in an orthodox context that is not a proper response to the statement being made. That type of response is using the word separate in its "action" sense while trying to underscore its "ideological" reference.
When I say that I do practice "separation" that is not a cause to say "see I told you" or "good I am glad". The reason being that, again, there is a difference between practicing separation and being a "separatist". Being a "separatist" is committing to an "ideology" that supports the strict use of separating (typically along ecclesiological lines)from other conservatives, with many political, theological, and institutional irons in the fire. Whereas practicing "separation" can simply refer to the action of keeping careful watch over yourself and those who have been entrusted to your care.
Again, as often times is true basic vocabulary is the point of confusion. Perhaps, this is helping me process the denotations and connotations of the word thus arriving at a usable "meaning". I am not trying to sound more post-modern than I perhaps am by being born in a pomo culture. I hope this helps. Its late, I imagine it won't. I'll read it again in the morning.

I'm a "Grease Monkey" for the Kingdom

2008-01-31T17:17:00.000-08:00

I am now in Michigan living a man's life. That is, I only go to work now, no more work and school. I kind of love it, and kind of hate it. I am working on machinery in a, well..."machine shop". I spent this morning "greasing the bearings". What?? I don't know. All I do know is that "greasing the bearings" makes me a "Grease Monkey" for a day. So, me and my good friend David Puddy can both say, "Don't say that, you know I don't like that term".

Anyway, I hope to use this blog in the up coming days. I am reading both Prayer and the Knowledge of God (Greame Goldsworthy-of whom I will never tire), and Everyday Theology (Kevin Vanhoozer-and TEDS student papers/thesis). I am enjoying both for completely different reasons, but both none-the-less. I am looking forward to discussing my findings, questions and opines with you in the near future.

Finally, I will say that if any of you are not using a Christ-centered hermeneutic in both Scripture and Culture (i.e. all of life) then shame on you. Seriously, all of life is tied to the gospel and how its goals are achieved. Being a "Grease Monkey" for a few months even counts.

Traveling

2008-01-19T17:47:00.000-08:00

Thanks to the many who helped my family pack up the Penske. It was a BIG one too. I went in the morning to lay hold of my reserved truck and the lady gave me a much unanticipated "up-grade". I went from the 22' to the 26'. So, yes if you hear of any "big rig" wrecks on the road it could be me I suppose.
Seriously though, I am very greatful to all who helped. It was an emotional good-bye for my wife and I as we said good-bye to a loved apartment and much loved friends. God's providence has been more than kind to my family here in Chesapeake. We will miss it very much, but never be able to even remotely forget it.
Special "shout-outs" go to Doug Anderson, and Tim Barker. Doug flew down to VB in order to help me drive the "semi"-truck all the way back. He is a pretty good traveling companion and a great friend.
Barker, came down from Maryland and gave me a hand loading the truck. Our conversation went something like this: [Adam]"Woa! there he is! What are you doing here?" [Tim] When I heard that you were moving I thought that you probably use some help. I wasn't sure if you had any friends left." [true story] [Adam] "ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. I think I still have a few." He's a good guy that Tim.
Finally, we will be staying in Michigan for a few months (probably 3-3 1/2). Then we will be in Pittsburgh planting a church in the North Oakland section of the city. If any of you wish to give me all your money I will gladly take it, thank you. :)

No seriously, SEND MONEY.

Living Vicariously

2008-01-08T15:27:00.000-08:00

Yes, yes, yes, I know, I know, I know...its been a while. I will try to work harder so that you are not soooo annoyed whenever you happen to check my blogspot.

Anyway, being that my son is coming into the world from such a theologically renowned family due to his father's exegetical brilliance; (said to be a kindred spirit of sorts with none other than Greame Goldsworthy himself) he is being heavily recruited by major seminaries. Trinity Evangelical Divinity School has interest, but I say, that is perhaps a second choice, let's talk to Reformed Theological Seminary, Orlando, and see what they have to give.

Perhaps my son is being pursued simply so that they can have a beautiful face out front on catalogs and things? I trust that my first assumptions are actually closer to the truth (see paragraph one).

Seriously though, thanks to Tim Baylor and Scott Logan for giving my son his first, perhaps of many, Trinity t-shirts. He says that he really loves it and then asks me, "Dad, is this where you went?" I simply nod my head and smile saying, "Yes son, that's where Dad went."

Sweet Child of Mine

2007-09-15T17:11:00.000-07:00

I am more than proud to announce (3 weeks after the fact) that Owen Gregory Thomas has been born into this world. He was, for all who don't know, 8.6 pounds 21" long. I must say, perhaps simply because he is mine, that he is the finest looking baby that I have ever seen.
In all seriousness, God has been gracious in his providence to Adri and I with all that has come about in our lives with the birth of our son. Both Adrianne and Owen are doing just fine.

On a simply human note, it is very fascinating to watch an infant learn and experience new sensations, simple ones too. For example it is amazing to watch him be fearful of having his diaper changed (by mom of course)and worrisome over being laid down in a spacious spot. I think that that is amazing that he simply doesn't know ANYTHING and is therefore on constant sensory overload. Yet I must say, as a more than proud father, he is still the smartest baby around. I mean c'mon he is a chip off the ol' block and that's not too shabby if I must say so myself.

Seriously, we love our son whom God has given us. Thank you for your prayers and friendly reminders about my putting him on the blog. Perhaps, I have a Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes complex? Can't let the paparazzi see the baby too early.

Finally, yes. I have sung Guns N Roses, "Sweet Child of Mine" to my son several times (not the Sheryl Crow version either).

We are here!!!

2007-06-27T19:00:00.000-07:00

The Eagle has landed. We are officially in Da'Burgh on one of our many survey trips. We (Jeff, Thresa, Dan, Adri and I) are praying about what God is going to do here in Pittsburgh through us. We are, thus far, having a great time exchanging ideas, aspirations, (not all of them all that great, but ideas none-the-less) and goals. The first challenge is to establish where (location speaking) God will (we trust) raise up and call out a people for himself (shadyside, Squirrel Hill, Bloomfield etc.). Once that is established then we can focus on where we will actually live and work ( we are all wanting to be able to walk to the church building).
I just hope that our agenda is God driven not presumptous. God exaltant not man centered.

Lord willing, some of this will actually galvanize this trip and we will eagerly look forward to coming again soon with more and more momentum.

Considering Blogging

2007-06-20T06:14:00.000-07:00

Recently, I took a trip to Michigan to visit family and during the portions that my wife drove I read this months CT (Christianity Today). There was a comment in one of the articles that really grabbed my attention, perhaps because I am guilty? Anyway, the comment was about how we live in a self-obssessed culture and this is reflected through the use of the internet especially. Examples, such as YouTube, and blogspot are a couple of those internet indicators that can demonstrate our obvious avenues of narcissism. That is, I wonder if I blog because I am self-motivated and really think that everyone should hear my thoughts because they are really what everyone needs? Or, do I blog more simply because I enjoy the internet "talking" with many friends that I just can't see everyday? I trust that my blog is not an avenue for more self-seeking and narcissism, but perhaps I could be victim to one more avenue of self-worship offered to me in our current culture. Is blogging really just a way to show everyone that would read just how smart, dumb, or indifferent one person can be? I hope not.
Used in the right vein I understand that blogging and anyother form of communication can be used to benefit the body of Christ, friendships, families etc. But I suppose that we must be diligent in preserving the right use of the blogosphere rather than falling asleep at the wheel of life and using it for more narcissism in an age of narcissism. Blogging is not a case for "If you can't beat'em join 'em".

thinking...

Detroit Stoned

2007-06-03T14:05:00.000-07:00

The Pistons are now eliminated from the playoffs by the Cavs and their hero "King James". Well, I guess after watching the Wings lose and now seeing the Pistons get stoned, perhaps we can still hope in the Tigers. We all know the Lions won't help in picking up the slack, sorry Stephen.

C'mon Tigs! Beat those Cleveland Indians!...punks.

Computer Issues

2007-05-24T16:42:00.000-07:00

I have been simply too tired to blog at night when I get home from work. I miss the fellowship of the internet, but I do not want to be driven by my blog. I really do enjoy it though. Anyway, I have also been without the internet recently since my computer (a 28lbs Dell) finally bit the dust. BIG TIME. The computer was fire hot and frozen on the screen. Long story short, I am now joining the possible one world church of Mac. Yes, that's right I have now joined the Apple community.

I now am going to spend some time on this new computer of mine and try to figure out what the heck I am doing with it? Do any of you 'Apple-ites' (my new Mac Fam) know how to make the webpage you are on full size (maximize)? The font on mine is like .03 (really, really small)?

The Kingdom of God

2007-05-03T12:26:00.000-07:00

For the last 2 years I have been studying the Scriptures from a more biblical-theological mindset (seeing the whole story of Scripture from start to finish), rather than from a systematic-theological mindset (seeing Scripture only through the lens' of single verses without respect to thier role in the whole story context-all 66 books). This type of reading (biblical-theological) has revolutionized my understanding of Scripture and doctrine. Nothing has been as rewarding in my studies as much as learning how to read Scripture. The whole story of the Bible is a beautiful one of God establishing his Kingdom. The Kingdom is from Genesis to Revelation into eternity.
I have come to understand the church as God's special people called out from the world to rest in grace under his rule and sovereign authority as our King, in order that we may proclaim the excellencies of him who called us from darkness into his marvelous light (1Peter 2). This has huge ramifications for all of us who belong to the church. As Kingdom subjects our gathering times must reflect the presence of the King who dwells among us (empowering us all within). Consider the sanctity of the Temple in the OT. How much more now should the people of God honor his presence among us with holy lives and fruitful worship since the beauty of the story has taught us that he no longer dwells in houses made with human hands (Acts 7) but rather dwells within us, his special people.

I will end here for the sake of time, but I will be posting on the ramifications of reading Scripture biblically-theologically in the future. Don't forget the story of Scripture in your daily readings. Only when we understand the whole can we best understand the pieces.

A bit of a broken record

2007-04-27T05:21:00.000-07:00

I know that I seem to post on "fundamentalism" to the point of which seems that I have a anger problem towards the movement, but that is not it. That is not to suggest that I agree with the idea of fundamentalism; I completely do not. However, I do not wish to characterize myself through writing, preaching, ministry philosophy, or any other context of expression to speak of what I am not, rather I would like to present what I am and hope to persevere in by God's grace and for his glory. Now, with that stated I will post what is of major importance regardless of fundamentalism or evangelicalism. The problem is simply in the church as a whole, namely, "Pharisaism" (Matt. 23).
My last reading in my seminary Systematic Theology studies was this by Anthony Hoekema:

Churches that fully accept Paul's teaching on justification by faith may yet exhibit another kind of legalism: the insistance that their members abstain from certain practices that are deemed wrong-though they are really "indifferent things".
With respect to the question of which practices are to be put on the list of "forbidden things" there is great variety. In the United States many evangelical churches, particularly of those of the fundamentalist type, have rules against smoking, drinking, movies, dancing, and card-playing. Many churches in Europe, however, whose members readily drink and smoke, recoil in horror at the idea of Christians wearing blue jeans or chewing gum. Some years ago my wife and I heard a sermon on the Parable of the Good Samaritan in a Protestant church in Interlaken, Switzerland. After describing how the Good Samaritan bandaged the injured man, put him on his donkey, and brought him to the Inn, the Pastor went on to say, "He [the Good Samaritan] gave him a cigarette and a beer, and had a little talk with him". We were greatly amused, and wondered how American fundamentalists might have reacted to this application of present day Swiss hospitality to the man in the Parable!
Hoekema goes on to say, "The danger involved in this type of legalism just described is that abstinence from these "indifferent things" comes to be thought of as the essential mark of a Christian. When this is the case, things that are less important receive greater emphasis than the things that are most important, so that we end up by majoring in minors. When this happens, we are like the Pharisees about whom Jesus said, "You give a tenth of your spices-mint, dill and cummin. But you have neglected the more important matters of the law-justice, mercy and faithfulness" (Matt 23:23).

Anthony Hoekema, Created in God's Image, (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 238-239.

Been Busy

2007-04-19T16:14:00.000-07:00

I am now back at work full time. My schedule with Seminary has died down to only a thursday night class for the next 2 weeks and then out for the summer. Unfortunately, this means that I have to join the "work-a-day-world" with the masses. I have learned to find enjoyment in my house framing, but yet it keeps me very tired at night. Now that I am full time hopefully I will develope those 'full time legs' and won't be soooo tired each evening. I have much planned for this summer by way of reading and studying my Hebrew. Busy, busy, busy. I guess I'll stop complaining and boast for just a moment.
Last week Adri and I found out the sex of our baby. IT'S A BOY! The nurse said, "Do you want to know the sex of the baby?" We (Adri and I) said, "Yes." She then said, "It's a boy." That is when Adri said, "How sure are you, statistically speaking?" She said, "Honey, 100%. Little girls don't have scrotums and penis'." Adam says, "Right on nurse lady! Right on!" We are both (Adri and I) very happy.
My son's name will be Owen Gregory Thomas. Owen, because my wife has liked it for quite some time, Gregory, for my father-in-law, and Thomas...well...you get it I'm sure. Anyway, now I really appreciate hearing Guns N' Roses, "Sweet Child of Mine" at work each day. I'm so pumped to see daddy's little fella.
Owen, God willing, will make his debut August 31. I can't wait!

Pics are forthcoming!

We Like Fam' Yo

2007-04-12T15:17:00.000-07:00

I thank God for good friends. Friends, that you know no matter what happens have your back (so to speak). Dan Valentine, among others, have been that for me in times when I have needed it the most. I have had my share of up's and down's not unrelated to my own doing I am sure but regardless each time my buddy Dan hung in there. It rarely gets better than a tight friend and fortunately I been able to experience that. God established Dan and I in a friendship during our time in college, it deepened during our seminary days (present-coming to an end) and has knit our hearts together for service in the future.

I say all that to say this, "Fam hooked me up yo!" The other night I got to small group and I received, according to Dan, "a mercy ministry" (I think that translates "Dude, you need some help") from him (I guess that makes him "mercy" personified hmmm....?). Anyway, I (of course)take the good gift of mercy and again, thank God for good friends.

The Gift:

Such Quick Reminders

2007-04-10T16:46:00.000-07:00

For all who have been reading my blog lately I would like to apologize. I feel that I have received a great reminder on just how deeply I need the empowering presence of God's Spirit in daily life. The scenario is perfect. I was talking about what I have come to love to discuss, plan and strategize about...and then...it hit. While talking about the great work of God and his plan for me to minister in his work of redemption (in all probability in the context of Pittsburgh) I proved to be, once again, a trangressor of the law. I failed to love a fellow brother. I read his comments and then "bit back" so quickly it even startled me (almost). I was reminded later that day that love working through faith "is patient and kind...is not arrogant or rude...it is not irritable or resentful". By virtue of my quick bitting comment I was guilty of breaking God's law.
Thus, once again, I was brought full circle. It is I who need to constantly be reminded of Christ and his power in my life which enables me to "put to death the deeds of my body" (Romans 8:13) even the death of arrogant or rude comments. It is Christ "who redeemed us from the curse of the law" (Galatians 3:13). Praise be to God.
How quickly God can humble us. I was talking about church planting and sharing what has become a great passion of mine in the last six months thinking all things are moving forward greatly, planning, strategizing and dreaming! Then, as quickly as it comes, it goes. I was shown just how much I still need God, as though for a moment I forgot that magnificent piece. Don't you just love our Father for his unwavering commitment to making us more like his Son in all matters, even in matters of mundane conversations.

"Let love be genuine. Abhor what is evil; hold fast to what is good. Love one another with brotherly affection, Outdo one another in showing honor" (Romans 12:9-10)

Brrrrr...

2007-04-05T16:08:00.000-07:00

Who would ever want to live in the North? Unfortunately, I think that I am going to be soon enough (Pittsburgh). What to do?

Rarely are baseball games postponed when there isn't so much as a raindrop. But Thursday's 1:05 p.m. ET scheduled game between Detroit and Toronto at Comerica Park was postponed by 10:15 a.m. ET due to chilly 27-degree temperatures and wind gusts as high as 32 mph.
Those wind gusts created a wind chill of 14 degrees, and the game was called due to "inclement weather," though there were only moderate snow flurries that fell leading up to the scheduled game-time. The forecast in Detroit didn't look much better the rest of the day, with a high temperature of 36 degrees and wind gusts of 40 mph.
"It was a smart decision, players are at risk," manager Jim Leyland said. "I think also you think of the fans when you call a game like this. No one wants to come out in this."

(HT: detroit.tigers.mlb.com)

Stop the Scandals

2007-04-04T11:10:00.000-07:00

Dever offers some great advice on how Christians can prevent private sin from becoming a public scandal. How do we fight sin among us? Dever writes, "Here's the good news: corrective discipline doesn't have to be public! Actually, in a healthy church, private corrective discipline is happening all the time. People in the church sin. But growing Christians welcome other Christians into their lives for the purpose of confessing their sins to one another (James 5:16, 1 John 1:5-10). That is, in large part, how spiritual growth happens-by accepting biblical correction. You need to be modeling this kind of humble accountability as a pastor and encouraging it in other members.
Confessing our sins to one another makes us bring our sins out into the light, where they can be dealt with in the context of mutually sanctifying friendships in which people are strenghtening each other through prayer, encouragement, and application of the Word. Sin needs darkness to grow-it needs isolation disguised as "privacy," and prideful self-sufficiency disguised as "strength."
The church needs to be a web of meaningful spiritual relationships in which people are engaging each other in casual conversation, spiritual conversation, mutually encouraging and sanctifying discipling relationships, mutual accountability, and small groups."

Whatever the sin, you are not alone. Persevere in Church fellowship.

Dever, Mark. The Deliberate Church. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2005), 68-67

Unfortunate and Scary

2007-04-03T16:04:00.000-07:00

I cannot think of any one major prospective that I have known of John Piper's and immediately thought that I disagreed? I know that my disagreeing with him is of no consequence to him or any other person in the world, but yet it troubles me. I so look up to Piper I just hate to see something come to the fore that I certainly (at this present time anyway) completely disagree with. He strongly dislikes the NIV and thinks that its use in preaching "undermines good God exultant preaching". Is that not a really weird position?
About the NIV he says, "I feel what I am about to say with a passion built up over 25 years. I have longed that there be something more readable than the NASB and more literal than the NIV. The NIV is a paraphrase with so much unnecessary rewording and so much interpretation that I could not preach from it." He goes on to say, "My biggest concern has to do with preaching. When a paraphrase becomes the standard preaching, reading, memorizing Bible of the church, preaching is weakened—robust expository exultation in the pulpit is made more difficult. Preaching that gives clear explanations and arguments from the wording of specific Biblical texts tends to be undermined when a Bible paraphrases instead of preserving the original wording on good English. And when that kind of preaching is undermined, the whole level of Christian thinking in the church goes down, and a Bible-saturated worldview is weakened, and the ability of the people—and even the pastors themselves-to root their thoughts and affections in firm Biblical ground diminishes."

I appreciate, as always, his agressive God-centered Christ exultant world-view, but I find it oddly placed or applied here in the NIV issue. The NIV is not by any means my choice or favorite translation, but yet I think that I could certainly preach from it without undermining "robust expository exultant" preaching. Ahh...I hate disagreeing with Piper. It really is unfortunate and scary.

The Story is the Gospel

2007-04-02T05:49:00.000-07:00

The most critical and invaluable thing that I have learned in Seminary is that the entire canon is simply the gospel. I do not say "simply" because it is 'oh so simple' student need not study. That is ANYTHING but the truth. In fact, tracing the beauty of the gospel as it unfolds throughout every square inch of the Holy Scriptures is intense, and quite difficult at times. However, I have learned, primarily through the teaching ministry of the Holy Spirit in my life, with the aid of men such as Ligon Duncan, Mark Dever and Greame Goldsworthy to see Jesus Christ in every section, passage, era and setting of Redemptive History. God foreshadowed the gospel of his Son in the OT only to beautify it and magnify it through his Son in the NT beginning with the mission of the incarnation. The whole story is the gospel at every turn the beauty and brilliance of God's covenant love is there.
A great primer for understanding the presence of the gospel throughout all of Scripture is Romans 10. Paul demonstrates the centrality of the gospel throughout the OT by using quotations or statements from or concerning Leviticus, Nehemiah, Deuteronomy, Joel, Isaiah, Nahum, and Psalms. He is arguing for the gracious gift of the gospel of Jesus Christ from every section of the OT. This is an invaluable lesson for all exegetes and pastors. It has huge ramification for EVERYONE who says that they love Jesus (the gospel). When properly understood this radically shapes our devotions, preaching, discipleship, and teaching at every level.
Never forget that the whole story of Scripture is God's story of his Son. The Gospel is THE STORY. How perfectly fitting for this time of year especially.

Passion '07

2007-03-31T06:24:00.000-07:00

This months CT features Passion '07 as the modern "Moravian Pietistic movement" or more closely related to our modern minds the "Youth for Christ Rallies" of the post-war era. The article is really good, and summarizes the essential elements of the Passion ideology/theology. The worship leaders are the Dave Crowder band, and Chris Tomlin, while the Preacher is John Piper. A women speaker, Beth Moore is brought along to teach and admonish the women, speaking on "insecurities and temptations that prey upon women".

Piper has been doing the conferences for 11 years. Concerning the american dream and giving Piper says, "You don't want to be always sitting in your SUV dropping nickles into other people's dreams". He spoke to CT saying, "Too long we have preferred theology to passion or passion to theology. I like Passion and Louie Giglio [the organizer of the events] and have been here 11 years because I believe in the potential to get it together. Most of these students have never heard anyone plead with them to think hard, go deep, get a theology, and jump up and down with David Crowder."

One student responded to CT by saying, "We're the generation who likes things raw and uncut and really in-your-face. It's almost like reverse psychology. [Piper's] not doing it for shock value, but he almost elicits that some response. He's saying the gospel without any sort of sugar-coating, with very few illustrations, and its hitting home."

I guess we'll have to wait and see what exactly God is doing through all of this with this next generation. Passion seems to be a great means that God is using to accomplish his global efforts for his supremecy.

Have You Heard...God still speaks

2007-03-22T15:05:00.000-07:00

I am referring to John Pipers grievence with this months CT article, "My conversation with God". You must take the time to read this article ALL THE WAY THROUGH. It is a huge rebuke to me. Piper, though I have never met the man personally, is the most influential person theologically in my life. As most all of you know, God has used and continues to use Piper in magnificant ways. He can articulate what all of us believe and make it so clear that no one can hardly voice any disagreement. I think that you will see what I am talking about in this article. MUST READ.

(Thanks Garrett for the hit on this article)

http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/TasteAndSee/ByDate/2007/2021_The_Morning_I_Heard_the_Voice_of_God/

A word on the atonement

2007-03-22T11:59:00.000-07:00

This is a brief understanding of my view (the traditional Reformed view) of the atonement and my reasoning behind why it is I believe that the death of Christ was specifically and purposefully for his elect.

The Scriptures declare that “Salvation belongs to the Lord” (Jonah 2:9). This is decisively expressed in the coming of Christ and his efficacious death on behalf of those in whom the Father had elected to save. When God the Father elected to save he sent the Son for the recovery of his people who would worship him singing a new song before his throne for all eternity (Rev. 5:9). This was then appropriated by the effectual calling of the Holy Spirit by which they were sealed for all eternity (Eph 1:13). The Holy Trinity worked in unison and completion to gather together the elect of God from “every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages” (Rev. 7:9). Thus the death of Christ actually secured their salvation infallibly. Simply put, Christ saves sinners. This might seem subtly different from but is actually radically different from saying, “Christ makes it possible for all sinners to be saved,” however, it is not a simple nuance.
Paul states, “Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners-- of whom I am the worst. But for that very reason I was shown mercy so that in me, the worst of sinners, Christ Jesus might display his unlimited patience as an example for those who would believe on him and receive eternal life. Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen (1Tim 1:15-17).
Christ died for sinners in order that they would be saved securely and infallibly. According to Paul, Christ came into the world to save, as demonstrated in his life, not simply to make salvation “possible” for all men equally. This was demonstrated in Paul’s salvation as an example for all the elect sinners in the redemptive plan of God the Father. The outcome of Christ’s actual accomplishment of saving sinners is praise and worship as demonstrated by Paul in v17.
The Scriptures affirm that the cross of Christ saves in all actuality. Christ was paying the penalty for his elect in a substitutionary fashion receiving their liability before God in himself suffering the wrath and judgment of God as a result. In this work he was accomplishing and securing forever their eternal life and all of its Christ-centered benefits. To suggest that all of heavens Christ-centered gifts such as faith, his priestly prayers and intercessory work, the giving of his Spirit and his Shepherding in the lives of his people throughout their days on earth (John 10) were accomplished on the cross for all men equally without distinction in the event itself simply seems foreign to the text. That is, this argument is never established or promoted in any text of Scripture. The work of redemption is one unitary work in the triune Godhead, where, the sinner receives all the benefits of God in Christ or none. That is to say, the benefits of Christ’s life are conditioned on his bearing our sins in his body. Warfield states, “The fundamental characteristic of the New Testament conception of redemption is that deliverance from guilt stands first; emancipation from the power of sin follows upon it; and removal of all the ills of life constitutes its final issue.[1]”
The argument must be made that God’s mighty sovereign grace did not “appear” to them since there was no evidence of it. For according to Paul, the mighty grace that “appears” is indeed grace that is irresistible. Once the grace of God appears (i.e. Jesus Christ) “it teaches us to renounce ungodliness…and to live godly lives” (Titus 2:11ff).
We do not teach ourselves, rather it is the grace of God that teaches us, and storms our rebellious hearts and unbending depraved wills conforming them to Christ. Paul affirms that when the “grace of God appears” it changes all who it appears to (Titus 2:11-3:1-15).
Other Scriptures:
Revelation 1:5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the first-born of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us, and released us from our sins by His blood,
Hebrews 1:3 And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high;
Acts 20:28 Be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood.
Matthew 1:21 And she will bear a Son; and you shall call His name Jesus, for it is He who will save His people from their sins."
Matthew 20:28 just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many."
Romans 5:8-9 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from the wrath of God through Him.

[1] Warfield, The Person and Work of Christ, 352.

Dear Abby

2007-03-16T06:08:00.000-07:00

This post comes from the "Dear Abby" column in the Virginia Pilot Thursday March 15. I found it quite humorous. The topic was "What's in a Name, Sometimes a Profession."
A women's name is Dragony and she works in a local pharmacy located in a medical building. Her license plate reads "DRAGONY". Well, someone went into the pharmacy and asked the girl at the counter, "Who is Dr. Agony?"

Another:
One of The North American Tobacco Co. sales representatives name is "Flicka Ashe". This is for real. Not joking.

Another:
Dear Abby I have sold real estate for 18 years, and no one ever forgets my name, Beth Newhouse, Mayville New York.

Another:
A Surgeon in Tennessee is named "Dr. Mark Cutright".

Another:
A Psychiatrist in Roton Bell, Dallas in named "John Looney".

Another:
In Idaho a man was arrested for urinating in a public place. His name is "Charles T. Sprinkle".

The Beauty of Belief Through the Action of Love

2007-03-15T12:20:00.000-07:00

I have been convicted recently with reference to thinking that "right belief" is demonstrated in "right love". That is to say with Paul, "And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing" (1Cor 13.2). The statement which encapsulates all of Augustine's theology is "faith which is operative through love". For belief is not enough since it is clearly stated that "even the demons believe and tremble" (James 2:19).
As I emphasize belief to myself I think of Calvin, who so perfectly expressed right belief, "This is our assurance, that Christ the Son of God is ours and has been given to us, so that in him we may also be sons of God...We experience such participation in him that, although we are sinners, he is our righteousness; while we are unclean, he is our purity; while we are weak, while we are unarmed and exposed to Satan, yet ours is that power...given him...to crush Satan; while we still bear about with us the body of death, he is yet our life. In brief, because all his things are ours and we have all things in him, in us there is nothing."
As now I am reminded, once again, belief is not enough or rather it is not the "proof" of a saint. Rather as Augustine expresses it, "As for love, which the apostle [Paul] pronounced greater than faith and hope, the greater it is in any person the better that person will be. When the question is raised whether someone is a good person, it is not what he believes or hopes that is at issue but what he loves. For someone who loves aright, assuredly believes and hopes aright, whereas someone who does not love believes in vain, even though what he believes is true, and likewise hopes in vain...unless what he believes and hopes is that in response to his prayer he can be granted to love."

May God grant us the power to love what we believe in a real measure throughout the body of Christ, lest we believe and hope in vain.

Quotes taken from, Justification in Perspective ed. Bruce L. McCormack

A MUST HAVE-SERIOUS THEOLOGY

2007-03-13T16:46:00.000-07:00

I am currently reading Justification in Perspective (a Baker 2006 ETS special ISBN0-8010-3131-1). It has been really informative and well written thus far. The book contributes theological insights to the doctrine of justification that are truly important, centered and worthy of MUCH thought. Some notable authors include, Nick Needham, David Wright, Bruce McCormack, Henri Blocher, Somon Gathercole and of course last but not least, N.T. Wright. I think that he has the "closer" in the book for the sake of attempting perhaps to unsettle the book.

Westminster Theological Seminary Review: Justification in Perspective is an excellent example of this latter sort of constructive theological dialogue. Each contributor comes from one of Reformed Protestantism's many strands and examines justification within a particular period or theologian from the early church and Augustine through the Reformers to modern developments in Barth and the New Perspective.

Seriously, the book is great, a MUST HAVE for my humble opinion with regards to the "issues" of justification.

The Westminster Legacy-Ministry

2007-03-12T08:26:00.000-07:00

These men are some of the earliest scholars to establish and work at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, founded in 1929. The commitment of these men was to the development and propogation of the Reformed faith (Five Solas). These teachings are perhaps most perfectly described in the Westminster Confession of Faith.

Five Solas:

Sola Gratia (grace alone)

Sola Fide (faith alone)

Sola Scriptura (Scriptures alone)

Sola Christus (Christ alone)

Soli Deo Gloria (Glory to God alone)

The Confession states:

By the decree of God, for the manifestation of His glory, some men and angels are predestined unto everlasting life . . . . These angels and men, thus predestined, . . . are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased of diminished. Those of mankind that are predestined unto life, God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to His eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure of his will, hath chosen, in Christ, unto everlasting gory, out of His mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith, or good works, or perseverance in either of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions, or causes moving Him thereunto; and all to the praise of His glorious grace. As God hath appointed the elect unto glory, so hath He, by the eternal and most free purpose of His will, foreordained all the means thereunto. Wherefore, they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ, are effectually called unto faith in Christ by His Spirit working in due season, are justified, adopted, sanctified, and kept by His power, through faith, unto salvation. - (Westminster Confession of Faith, III/ iii-vi)

Too Beautifully Biblical To Ignore

2007-03-09T07:16:00.000-08:00

Many of you may have your "reservations" or nervous twitches when it comes to typology in Scripture, but I have to, as you probably well know by now, once again sound the trumpet. Graeme Goldsworthy's book "According to Plan" was written for laymen (and by the way EXTREMELY HELPFUL TOO) and I had to read it for an OT Theology class 2yrs ago and it revolutionized my thinking about the Gospel and HIS impact upon all of Scripture. I know that you can only know the Text as you know it in relation to Christ, since it is indeed as "testimony" of him.

Goldsworhty gives an interview on this blog and it is well worth the time to check it out (http://buzzardblog.typepad.com/buzzard_blog/2007/02/graeme_goldswor_1.html).
Goldsworthy says, "Biblical theology is the study of how every text in the Bible relates to every other text in the Bible. It's the study of the matrix of divine revelation. At the heart of the gospel is the person of Jesus Christ; he is the word of God come in the flesh. The nature of the gospel is such that it demands that it be at the centre of the biblical message. Biblical theology is, then, the study of how every text in the Bible relates to Jesus and his gospel. Thus we start with Christ so that we may end with Christ. Biblical theology is Christological, for its subject matter is the Scriptures as God's testimony to Christ. It is therefore, from start to finish, a study of Christ."

Consider these "types" of Scripture in relationship to the salvation revealed in Christ:
(1) Adam (Genesis 1-2; Romans 5).
(2) Moses (Exodus 32-34; John 1:1-18). Jesus is presented as a new Moses who brings about the new exodus of a new people (Jn 3:14-15; Num 21:8-9; Jn 6:32-35, 49-51, 58; Num 11:7-9; Heb 3:1-6).
(3) Israel (=son language; Isaiah 5; Hosea 11:1; Mt 2:15; Jn 15).
(4) Leaders (prophets, priests, kings).
(5) David (2 Sam 7:14; Isa 9:6-7; 11:1f; Ezk 34; Mt 22:41f; Acts 2:22-36).
(6) Institutions (temple, Passover, sacrifices).
(7) Events (exodus – Isa 40, esp. vv. 1-5, 9-11; Isa 63-64, esp. 63:7-19 and 64:1-12; cf. also Hos 11:1ff).

Well, You asked for It

2007-03-08T14:23:00.000-08:00

"G" said:

I think I can guarantee that Thomaswon't be gaining celebrity status any time soon. Imagine seeing his face on the cover of one of those cigar magazines! "Adam Thoms: The Theologian America Loves to Hate".

smLogan said:

now that's a magazine i would definitely subscribe (and gladly contribute) to.

*Please don't be offended guys. A little "locker room" humor is perhaps fitting for just a moment.

Many Thanks to James Gordon and his finding this old copy of my life as an aficionado

Simply Described, yet Devastatingly Accomplished

2007-03-08T05:51:00.000-08:00

What it means to be justified (which means imputation of righteousness!) as a Christian is perfectly described by early church father, John Chrysostom (349-407 AD):

And what has he done? "Him that knew no sin He made to be sin, for you." For if he had achieved nothing elsebut done only this, think how great a thing it is to give His Son for those that had outraged Him. But now he has truly achieved mighty things, and besides, has allowed him that did no wrong to be punished for those who had done wrong. Yet Paul did not say this, but mentioned that which is far greater than this. What then is this? "Him that knew no sin," he says, Him that was righteousness itself, "He made sin," that is allowed Him to be condemned as a sinner, as one cursed to die. "For cursed is he that hangs on a tree" (Gal. 3.13). For to die like this was far greater than simply to die; and this he also elsewhere implies, saying, "Becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" (Phil. 2.8). For this thing carried with it not only punishment, but also disgrace.

Reflect therefore what great things He bestowed on you. For it would indeed be a great thing for even a sinner to die for anyone whatever; but when He who undergoes this is righteous and yet dies for sinners; and not only dies, but even dies as one cursed; and not as cursed only, but thereby freely bestows upon us those great benefits which we never anticipated (for he says "we might become the righteousness of God in Him)-what words, what thought shall be adequate to realize these things? "For the Righteous One he made a sinner," he says, "that He might make the sinners righteous." Indeed rather, he did not even say this, but what was greater by far; for the word he employed is not he habit [sinner], but the quality [of sin] itself.

For this is the righteousness of God, when we are justified not by works, in which case it would be necessary that not even a spot should be found, but by grace, in which case all sin is done away. And this, at the same time that it does not allow us to be lifted up (for it is entirely the free gift of God), teaches us also the greatness of what is given. For what came before was a righteousness of the law and of works, but this it the righteousness of God."

Nick Needham notes, "Here is what the Reformers were to call "the wonderful exchange": Christ being made sin with humanity's sin, so that we might become righteous with a divine righteousness."

Quotations taken from:

Needham, Nick. "Justification in the Early Church Fathers." quoting John Chrysostom's work, "Homilies on 2Corinthians 11.5." All quotations coming from "Justification in Perspecitive" edited by Bruce L. McCormack, (Baker: Grand Rapids, 2006), 35.

If Anyone is Above Reproach Tit. 1.6

2007-03-04T10:35:00.000-08:00

My Pastor has recently begun preaching through Titus. Our church has been forced to think through many issues with regards to church leadership (organizational structure i.e. Elder Rule), our testimony as believers among "outsiders" (unbelieving co-workers, neighbors etc), and most controversially what means exactly for a minister to be "above reproach". The format at our church is structured in such a way that our small group meets on wednesday nights at someone's home for discussion on the Sunday service/message.

When it came time to discuss the Sunday message it was very interesting when people began to discuss what it meant to them to have their Pastor to be "above reproach". As a aspiring Pastor I am always interested in this kind of discussion. I would like to know what you might think constitutes being "above reproach"? What was in the mind of the Apostle when he was saying that Elders must be "above reproach"? In other words, what brings about "reproach"? It is an interesting phrase in the hands of many people. Many love to use it in relation to "liberty issues", however, what is reproachable about living in freedom? Is being "above reproach" biblically defined and clearly objective? Should Pastors seek to honor the myriad of preferences among those to whom they minister all in the name of being "above reproach"whether those prefrences are biblically defined or not?

Case in Point: Charles Spurgeon (I know, I know, everyone can "use" Spurgeon, and it is true that he is the most misquoted and manipulated minister of the Christian Church but just listen).

In reference to his love of fine cigars and the controversy that surrounded it (i.e. loss of testimony, no longer "above reproach", loss of influence etc) Spurgeon wrote:

I demur altogether and most positively to the statement that to smoke tobacco is in itself a sin. It may become so, as any other indifferent action may, but as an action it is no sin.Together with hundreds of thousands of my fellow-Christians I have smoked, and, with them, I am under the condemnation of living in habitual sin, if certain accusers are to be believed. As I would not knowingly live even in the smallest violation of the law of God, and sin in the transgression of the law, I will not own to sin when I am not conscious of it.There is growing up in society a Pharisaic system which adds to the commands of God the precepts of men; to that system I will not yield for an hour. The preservation of my liberty may bring upon me the upbraidings of many good men, and the sneers of the self-righteous; but I shall endure both with serenity so long as I feel clear in my conscience before God...I am told that my open avowal will lessen my influence, and my reply is that if I have gained any influence through being thought different from what I am, I have no wish to retain it. I will do nothing upon the sly, and nothing about which I have a doubt.

What say you?

Quote taken from:

(http://www.spurgeon.org/misc/cigars.htm)

Update: Cummings, David, Mike, Lerro

2007-03-01T16:26:00.000-08:00

I have been very slack in updating my blogger-role. When I started this blog I was merely trying to "tag" a minimum number of people since I did not intend to keep this blog anyway. However, much time has passed and many blogs have been started and or continued. So, I say all that to say this, I have updated my blog "shoutouts".

I have added Mike Osborne's blog. Mike is a good friend that really had a hand in my earliest discipleship. I shared a room with him in college for 2 years and it was very formative in my early growth. I really look back on those days with appreciation.

I have also added the Lerro family site. Dan has become a good friend since I have come to know him better ministering alongside him at CBCOceana (our church). He has much to offer.

I have added David Griffiths' blog also. This was a long time coming in that David has had his blog up and running for a long time. He is very good on cultural engagement. He is a good writer and very thoughtful. I have known David as a classmate, oddly enough as a teacher of mine and also as a friend. I will never forget when I took Ephesians in Bible College from David. Our final projects reflected Davids view of exegesis (the more I think about it especially) and life. It was great. I look back on those days in that class upstairs in the ERC building at NBBC right before lunch and I can do nothing but smile. Hey David, I still don't think that I liked your "Mr. Rogers-esqe" cardigan, but hey you da man.

Finally, I have added the Cummings family site also. Jonny was one of my best buddies at NBBC, especially speaking in terms of my last year there. Jonny was ALWAYS challenging me to stop thinking like a "literal dispensational" dare I say 'psycho'. I was not always ready for Jon's thoughts, but yet I always welcomed them. We would hang out in my room after school eating Cheez-it's, drinking some soda (no Guinness) and talking about where we were going to go to Seminary. I won't even say who chose the, oh let's say, perhaps the "better" choice.
He also gets the credit for introducing me to the great John Owen. He printed out about a $50 copy of "The Death of Death in the Death of Christ" for me when he worked up stairs at NBBC as a 3ohr. worker. Thanks to Jonny's efforts of printing out an illilegal amount of paper upstairs under the guise of 30 hr. working I spent that whole semester reading Owen. Thanks Jonny.
I must say, it is a family blog so Christine does most of the posting, if not all, but hey you can enjoy the pictures. Their kids are cute.

On a sad update notice: I may have to take off the CRBlog. I think that Chris Bruno, another college roommate of mine seems to be no longer out there in blogosphere. Are you out there Chris???? I am guessing he does not have time to blog seeing as how he working at getting into a Wheaton PhD. That is much sweeter than blogging I must say.

And So It Begins!

2007-03-01T10:52:00.000-08:00

The Tigers are now back in action. The offseason has been an interesting one too. As you may know the "Tigs" (tie-gs) have acquired Gary Sheffield from the New Yor Yankees. The 19 year veteran came to Detroit in light of some "disagreements" with the Yankees clubhouse. He is considered to be one of the fastest bats/quickest hands (wrists) in MLB. However, let's be honest here it is not like he is getting any younger and if I am correct on this I believe he had surgery on those quick hands/wrists last year. This might leave him a little slower? Anyway, all indications from Manager Jim Leyland seem to point to nothing but excitement for the All-Star and his abilities.

In other notes, Jeremy Bonderman signed a 38 million dollar deal, which will leave him in Detroit for atleast 4 more seasons. Bonderman was awesome in the Postseason last year and added much to the Tigs overall changes. Bonderman seems to be worth his weight in gold, or in this case green, and lots of it. He is working hard to add a deadly change-up to his pitching arsonal. If this happens he will perhaps not only win games for Detroit, but may very well dominate.
So far the Tigers beat the Mets 1-0 in the first unofficial outing of the pre-season.

All I can say, once again is, Play on Playaz.

Jesus True Israel

2007-02-23T06:23:00.000-08:00

I am still as always wrestling with the "issues" of understanding Jesus to be the "true Israel". I am so frustrated some times with the entire process and the polarity involved with this understanding. A few thoughts:

The whole biblical-theological setting of redemptive history seems to setting the stage in the OT for the NT understanding of Jesus as God's true Son. That is, Israel, to whom all the promises are given, and from whom Jesus would come, is called "Israel is My firstborn son" (Ex 4.22). Again, the prophet says, "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son" (Hosea 11.1). Redemptive history demonstrates that God pours out his love upon his first born (dare I say "only begotten") son. Thus, in the NT the proclamation of Jesus as the "son of God" is staggering and pregnant with fulfillment language. I say fulfillment b/c Matthew says, "And he rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt. And remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, "out of Egypt I will call My son" (Mt 2:14-15 cf. Hosea 11:1).
Also notice that Hosea is speaking out against "all Israel" throughout the entire book. He is addressing a nation, but yet this national language seems to have individual overtones which are picked up by the NT authors (as stated in Mt above). Is the prophetic ministry of Hosea to a national "Son" going to be fulfilled in the True Son, Jesus Christ, (and consequently fulfilled in us who are in Him)? Thus, establishing Jesus as the True Son of God, the True Israel? Notice Hosea's national yet individual prophecy:
"Come let us return to the LORD; for he has torn us, that he may heal us;
He has struck us down, and he will bind us up.
After two days he will revive us;
on the third day he will raise us up,
that we may live before him (Hos. 6.1-2).

This is fulfilled in Jesus, God's True Son, the True Israel. Right?
Jesus was struck down and was raised on the third day in order that "we may live before him"!

What say you of this?

God makes all the Difference

2007-02-22T08:13:00.000-08:00

I am in the middle of reading, How Long O Lord? -Reflections on Suffering and Evil, by D.A. Carson. The book is really a great treatment of a difficult and often times anxiety driven question, "Where is God in all of this," (suffering/Evil)? In speaking on the reality of hell and men's moral choice in relation to his destiny (repentence or defiance) Carson states,

"Heaven would surely be hell to those who do not enjoy and desire the blessing of the unshielding presence of God" (p92).

God is the difference between heaven and hell, not streets of gold nor lakes with crystal imagery.

As Piper says, "God is the Gospel".

"Come Lord Jesus"

2007-02-19T13:01:00.000-08:00

I have been recently provoked to praise through reading, "God's Empowering Presence, the Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul," by Gordon D. Fee. I am not sure how much "already-not yet" you have read, but let me assure you, this understanding of the Spirit's work in you is wonderful. The idea is simply this, all believers live in the "already-not yet" phase of eternity. By virtue of your union to Jesus Christ the future age (eternity) is "already" here set in motion within you. The giving of the Spirit to you as a believer demonstrates this. However, the end has only begun, thus, we are "not yet" at the consummation of the ages. We still eagerly await the final event (second coming). Therefore it is said of us that we (Christians) live "between the times", that is, the future has "already" begun within us, but it is "not yet" completed. There you have it, you, Christian are a New Creation in the Lord best understood as living in the "already-not yet".
This paragraph from the book is excellent:
"The church is an eschatological community, whose members live in the present as those stamped with eternity. We live as expatriates on earth; our true citizenship is in heaven (Phil 3:20). Ethical life, therefore, does not consist of rules to live by. Rather, empowered by the Spirit, we now live the life of the future in the present age, the life that characterizes God himself...Believers have tasted of the life to come; and the full and final realization of the future is so certain that God's new people are completely radicalized as they live "already" but "not yet."

Gordon D. Fee, God's Empowering Presence, Peabody: Hendrickson, 2005, 804.

"Behold, a Great Red Dragon" Rev 12.3

2007-02-17T12:27:00.000-08:00

Is this the face of Satan? I have been asking myself that question for quite sometime and now, after yesterdays episode of "The Oprah Winfrey Show," I ask myself with even more seriousness. Now granted, I do most often times agree with Edwards' assertion that confronting Arminianism is "the principle need of the hour," but currently Oprah Winfrey, who is not altogether unrelated to the issues of Arminianism since she is the most deadly Palagian around(and that is being kind), has got my attention for the moment.

Yesterday's episode was about the new wave of "world changing" powers. This power is called "The Secret". Understanding "The Secret" enables one to create thier best destiny by tapping into the the providential energies of the universe, or as Oprah names it, "The divine laws". "The Secret" is defined as the law of attraction, which states that like attracts like. The concept says that the energy you put into the world—both good and bad—is exactly what comes back to you. This means you create the circumstances of your life with the choices you make every day. Rev. Dr. Michael Beckwith, who is the leader of the "New Thought Movement, says he thinks "The Secret" is alluring because it helps people stop feeling like victims. "I think us talking about the law of attraction, talking about these universal spiritual principles, allows them to see that they can begin to govern their thoughts and their way of life." This is nothing more than simple Karma with a spin of God on it. Don't be mistaken, Oprah Winfrey is deadly. She is claiming to 49 million viewers a week in 122 different countries that she believes in and loves God all the while espousing a false gospel (it is a "Gospel" too she claims that "God definitely fits into it").

The USA Today wrote in an article about her that stated, "After two decades of searching for her authentic self — exploring New Age theories, giving away cars, trotting out fat, recommending good books and tackling countless issues from serious to frivolous — Oprah Winfrey has risen to a new level of guru. Over the past year, Winfrey, 52, has emerged as a spiritual leader for the new millennium, a moral voice of authority for the nation." There is also a book published entitled, "The Gospel According to Oprah," written by Marcia Nelson.

I am serious, Oprah Winfrey is so influential, and her gospel is damning to millions. Is this women the Beast?

1. Iain H. Murray, Jonathan Edwards, A New Biography, Carlisle: Banner of Truth Trust, 1987), 282.

2. http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-05-10-oprah_x.htm

3. www.oprah.com

Let Your Kingdom Come

2007-02-15T15:03:00.000-08:00

Our church (cbcoceana.org) decided to offer two classes for biblical education. I have been given the opportunity to teach Biblical Theology (really an introduction to) and as a result I have had to articulate what I perceive to be the "center" or overarching message of the Scriptures. I perceive, thus far, that the Kingdom of God is the center/overarching message of the Scriptures. I am growing in both my commitment to this understanding and in my handling of it. I have really enjoyed it, especially at the church level. That has been my greatest joy this year.

Anyway, I was reading an essay entitled, "What is the Kingdom," by George Eldon Ladd and I mostly enjoyed it. I thought that perhaps you would also enjoy his thoughts as well, as you consider your daily life lived in the power of the Spirit as a citizen of God's Kingdom.

"The Word of God does say that the Kingdom of God is a present spiritual reality. "For the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit" (Rom. 14:17). Righteousness and peace and joy are fruits of the Spirit which God bestows now upon those who yield their lives to the rule of the Spirit. They have to do with the deepest springs of the spiritual life, and this, says the inspired apostle, is the Kingdom of God."

"The very complexity of the Biblical teaching about the Kingdom of God is one of the reasons why such diverse interpretations have arisen in the history of theology. Isolated verses can be quoted for most of the interpretations which can be found in our theological literature. The Kingdom is a present reality (Matt. 12:28), and yet it is a future blessing (I Cor. 15:50). It is an inner spiritual redemptive blessing (Rom. 14:17) which can be experienced only by way of the new birth (John 3:3), and yet it will have to do with the government of the nations of the world (Rev. 11:15). The Kingdom is a realm into which men enter now (Matt. 21:31), and yet it is a realm into which they will enter tomorrow (Matt. 8:11). It is at the same time a gift of God which will be bestowed by God in the future (Luke 12:32) and yet which must be received in the present (Mark 10:15). Obviously no simple explanation can do justice to such a rich but diverse variety of teaching."

Like Arrows in the hand of a Warrior - Ps 127.4

2007-02-12T05:18:00.000-08:00

I have been given the "ok" from my wife to gladly announce that Seminary alone is no longer my only child! I am presently in the process of casting off the son of the slave women (biblical imagery- just for you Luther/Logan) and claiming the blessing of making a great nation from my own offspring.

This is a picture of the little "guy" (perhaps anyway) at 10 weeks. He/she is only 2 inches long! We are very excited that God has entrusted us with a child and we trust he will be honored in each step of the way.

Is That Really The "Problem"?

2007-02-10T07:40:00.000-08:00

I have been examining (lightly) my perspective on blogging recently and I have come to some realizations about the whole "idea" of blogging, specifically the content of blog posts. Reviewing most of my posts in the past has enlightened my thinking about content in the future. I know that I have lost some of my "readership" (for lack of a better term) since I am to say the least a "lazy" or "sporatic" writer/talker. However, I cannot help but to think that it has something to do with the content of the posts in general. One thing that is interesting is how the criticism comes from some of the general public about how people want to read "edifying" material and encouraging dialogue. However, I find that when I try to sympathize with the criticism NO ONE really cares to interact with the "edifying" material. This is not a problem for me (I really don't care), but it just says something about those who criticize.
When "controverisal" subjects or statements are posted people come out of the woodwork to rebuke writers over the lack of edification in the material and dialogue, but they never post when the material truly is edifying?
I say all that to say this, it seems to be that people want annoying material so that THEY CAN criticize! That seems to be the only logical explanation to this blogging phenomenon. So really, you will criticize material for being to "controversial" (lack of edification), but if there is no material to criticize you will complain within yourself that there is nothing here to engage (criticize). Oh what a merry-go-round.
Anyway, I hope to continue with this vein for sake of engaging "controversial" material, though to those who are not looking to criticize will not see the controversy of the material at all, and those who simply want to criticize because that is what they love to do, will equally find pleasure in criticizing and that will bring a certain level of enjoyment to me as the writer as well (weird I know, but entertaining none-the-less).

Anyway, here's to all the "haters" and the "lovers"; let's enjoy criticizing and loving, while loving all the same.

An Encouraging Word

2007-02-09T06:11:00.000-08:00

"And I will have mercy on NO Mercy, and I will say to Not My People; You are my people; and he shall say, 'You are my God".

Hosea 2:23

He Removes Kings and Sets up Kings

2007-02-03T14:02:00.000-08:00

When I first established this blog I was planning on discussing a descent amount of politics. I have always enjoyed political science and such. I was a strong listener to Bill O'reilly and I read a fair amount of the not-so-sane Anne Coulter. However, politics are like hotdogs for me. I always think that I want them, I even enjoy them, but then I get very sick of them. Anyway, in light of this present political preemptive war (the dems talking about who will be the next front runner) I have been comforted by the Book of Daniel.

In the midst of such arrogant posturing and self-centered ambition (by both the "right" and the "left") we can find great peace in Daniel. Consider the messages of Daniel to the same type of people.

Nebuchadnezzar: "Blessed be the name of God forever and ever, to whom belong wisdom and might. He changes times and seasons; he removes kings and sets up kings" (2:20-21)
Even the foolish confess, "How great are his signs, how mighty his wonders! His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and his dominion endures from generation to generation" (4:3-4).
And once again he admits (as all will do), "for his dominion is an everlasting dominion, and his kingdom edures from generation to generation; all the inhabitants of the earth are accounted as nothing, and he does according to his will among the host of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay his hand or say to him, "what have you done?" (4:34-35)

Darius was no different, he too confessed, "for he is the living God, enduring forever; his kingdom shall never be destroyed, and his dominion shall be to the end" (6:26).

I say all that to say this, chill on political anxiety. God is ruler of all nations and his kingdom is our greatest concern (Matthew 6:33).

More Hip Hop for my iPod Please!!

2007-01-18T13:34:00.000-08:00

One afternoon during the Christmas holiday I was walking through a Christian bookstore looking, as always, for any Piper material that they might have had. I picked up a copy of "The Pleasures of God". While I was holding onto the book looking over it a voice came over my shoulder and said, "He's really good". I turned around to find a young black guy (age 17-19) smiling at me. He said that Piper has really changed his thinking about the church. I was astounded. I never seem to meet people like that in popular Christian bookstores. Typically Joel Osteen or Billy Graham are the most touted authors, not Piper.

I said to him, "That's great to hear"! He went onto ask me, "Who else do you like to read?" I said R.C. Sproul, Mark Dever and Greame Goldsworthy. He said, "Ah yea, Sproul is great. I have been trying to teach my pastors about how the church is supposed to look, ya know, how we are to love the Word and preach the Gospel without compromise". He said, "We have just got to go deeper". Again, I was astounded.

He then asked about what music I love to listen to. I told him pretty much anything by sovereign grace, Chris Tomlin, (let's be honest here, Petra and Switchfoot also, I know, I know...). He asked my about Rap. I was honest and said, well, as you can see by looking at me that that is not necessarily my particular culture, but yet I still enjoy bits and pieces.

He gave me a few websites and encouraging words about the Hip Hop movement in evangelicalism.

Anyway, I enjoyed our conversation so much that I went and checked out the websites. I really liked much of what I found! Heck, I think that I might even venture out into a Hip Hop for the old iPod.

I say all that to say this, check out www.theambassadoronline.com This guy is the REAL DEAL. He is in connection with CrossMovement Records. Seriously, you need to check out his video! If I were a real blogger I would have posted the video here on my site, but again, let's be honest, I'm a hack.

Anyway, check it out because the Ambassador gonna make you wanna jump! jump! Adam is gonna make you wanna jump! jump! Jesus is gonna make you wanna...well...never mind. :)

You have to go to www.theambassadoronline.com. Check out the video he is featuring. It is really great.

Happy New Year!

2006-12-31T11:26:00.000-08:00

I wish I had a pair of these glasses for tonight. I have yet to go to New York City for New Years Rockin' Eve, perhaps I am not cool enough (young, hip etc.) to hang out there anyway. I enjoy getting together with friends though and going out for dinner and a movie.

Anyway, tonight remember that although it is CERTAINLY true that it was "for freedom that Christ set us free" (Gal 5:1) also remember to enjoy your freedom with the goal of demonstrating to others that it is for Christ's sake ALWAYS that you enjoy your freedom. Enjoy your freedom in such a way as to serve the supremecy of Christ and to make others glad in him.

On that note, "Cheers!" and a Happy New Year!

And to All a Merry Christmas

2006-12-20T10:24:00.000-08:00

Well, that is all for now. I am on my way to Michigan to spend Christmas with my family. I am looking forward to a little R&R (little being the operative word there). There is just too many friends to see, conversations to have and brilliance to be shared (by me of course). No seriously though, I hope that we all remember the grace of Christmas throughout all the "hustle and bustle" of the season. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, purchasing us with perfection and applying his righteousness to our account. God became frail human flesh, glory to his name. "May those who love your salvation say continually, "Great is the LORD" (Psalm 40:16).
Whether you are spending Christmas in peace and quiet or you are travelling into a Christmas gathering that tends to reflect The Griswold's Family Christmas (national lampoons), don't forget to dwell on Christ. He is not a passing thought, but must be a hearts adoration and reflection. He must command our affections and attention this season.

God bless and Merry Christmas

Still More Friends I Have Never Met

2006-12-16T15:00:00.000-08:00

As a type of presbyterian revolutionary, Machen fought for the solas against modernist during the early part of the 20th century. He taught New Testament at Princeton Theological Seminary until he felt the need to dispute the moderates no longer, moving to Philadelphia he founded Westminster Theological Seminary in 1929. Of notable mention is the fact that Machen referred to B.B. Warfield as the greatest man he had ever met.

Even though Machen separated from the liberals at Princeton he never embraced Fundamentalism, the reason being he did not believe that premillenialism was biblical (the sine qua non of Fundamentalism-even today). Finally, he also felt the need to engage liberals with Reformed Theology, forcing them to reconcile thier views with Scripture, rather than simply walking away.

Machen was a godly man and one of the last true "Princestonians" and I would be very pleased to meet him.

The Office - 1 Hour Special

2006-12-14T05:04:00.000-08:00

As noted in the subtitle of this blog, The Office has a special place of interest for me. I must say that I have been mostly disappointed with this season, but nonetheless the show continues to be quite funny. Tonight The Office will be on for a 1 hour Christmas special. I have no way of knowing if it will be really funny or not but I would be willing to suggest that it will be. Last years Christmas party was absolutely hilarious.
This is a picture of when Michael received an oven-mit during gift exchange. He hated it and publically complained about how stupid it was and how that anyone who would give this as a gift to someone else is stupid. However, there was something like a 10 dollar gift limit, but of course Michael spent something like $400.00 on a video iPod. I mean, this guy is obnoxious and you will be worse off if you don't take the time to see it yourself tonight at 8:00pm on NBC.

:) :) :) :) Ha Ha Ha! :)

2006-12-12T17:34:00.000-08:00

I thought this might make you chuckle a bit as it did me...

"Fundamentalism involves a mindset as well as a set of beliefs; it includes attitudes as much as beliefs; it is perhaps as much a psychology as a theology. The Fundamentalist tends to see issues in terms of black and white, either absolutely right or completely wrong. The Fundamentalist must be absolutely certain even in areas where human certainty is suspect [obvious from odd stances on eschatology] . The seeking for extreme certainty may in fact mask a deeper level of doubt. This kind of mindset can often tolerate error better than ambiguity; atleast a known evil can be confronted. Fundamentalists also tend to be 100 percenters, a trait commendable at times but with a potential for excessive actions which at times may border on finaticism."

Anyway...

McBeth, Baptist Heritage, 768.

ON READING

2006-10-16T12:00:00.000-07:00

I came across this today and I thought that it could be of some help. I found it to be a rich reminder about the goal of Christian reading.

"Read as an act of worship. Read to be elevated into the great truths of God so that you may worship the Trinity in Spirit and in truth. Be selective about what you read, however. Measure all your reading against the touchstone of Scripture. So much of today's Christian literature is froth, riddled with Arminian theology or secular thinking. Time is too precious to waste on nonsense. Read more for eternity than time, more for spiritual growth than professional advancement. Think of John Trapp's warning: 'As water tastes of the soil it runs through, so does the soul taste of the authors that a man reads".

Quote taken from: Feed My Sheep: A Passionate Plea for Preaching, Soli Deo Gloria Pub. 120.

Admonish One Another in Song

2006-10-11T09:50:00.000-07:00

I have recently grown ill over the lack of emphasis, both by myself and others whom I know, on corporate singing as a part worship. For myself, I am not a huge "music person". I know nothing about it as far as melody, measure or rythm is concerned. However, as I said, I am now growing ill over the lack of emphasis that is placed upon singing among Christians in corporate worship.

Consider that the five books of the Psalms compose the largest literary section of all the Scriptures. The original title in the Hebrew for the book of Psalms means "songs of Praise" (tehillim). The books are saturated with the people of God responding to God's redemptive acts on their behalf for his own sovereign pleasure. The writers are writing with a congregation in view. The context of nearly every Psalm assumes the presence of the congregation of the people of God. Unarguably, the function of the Psalms was for both public and private WORSHIP. That is to say, if you take the title "Songs of Praise" and combine it with the books overall function "worship" you would have the largest portion of the Holy Scriptures functioning as a "Hymnal" of sorts (or preferably a book containing thousands of sweet Sovereign Grace worship songs). The Psalms were sung as a part of Israel's public worship!

Unfortunately, I have long missed this so OBVIOUS truth that I have argued that the NT is nearly silent on the issue of music and therefore music must not truly matter in the local church. That is to say, if we were to just toss out the "song service" altogether and get right to the preaching than I would be all for it. I now shout to myself, "How UNBIBLICAL!" How can a biblical ministry survive when it fails to recognize the importance of "adminishing one another" by "singing Psalms and hymns and spiritual songs" (Col. 3:16-17)?

In this new thread of thinking I take away two key thoughts:

(1) All of us who have down played the role of music in corporate worship have really missed the boat.
(2) Singing songs with emotional responses is truly biblical (the Psalms represent every emotion possible). Our singing cannot be lifeless or we are not truly singing at all. Read the Psalms and remember that they were written for corporate singing! How is it that we can sing without ANY emotion to Jesus Christ our Savior? How does that "admonish" anyone?
(3) Consequently, the "battle" for sound Christian music within the local assembly, a part of the corporate worship of God's people, is a "battle" worth going through. That is for all of you who remain in affiliations were music remains to be an issue (namely, any church where Bob Jones graduates attend) i.e. Fundamentalism.
P.S. This is not an attack on any one person from Bob Jones, I have friends from BJ, rather it is just an honest assessment of the musical thinking be propagated from the university and thus penetrating the local church.

The beauty of the Gospel

2006-09-23T15:29:00.000-07:00

Be blessed.

This is a quote from Aaron Burr, who was a student at Yale university in 1740's.

"I had spent my life in a dream...but then I was brought to the footstool of sovereign grace...before this I was strongly attached to the Arminian scheme"

Ian Murray, Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography

Just Some Food for Thought

2006-09-09T08:37:00.000-07:00

When I read this I could not help but to think in terms of much of our modern ecclesiastical "situations". Read this text and see if you too hear much of it being played out in the here and now or atleast it should be said in the here and now. Fortunately, some of us see this and are trying to curb some of the older edges and actually engage the issues of today effectively. That is not to suggest that history is irrelavent, rather I am just suggesting that there is a present and that present and it needs to be relavently engaged.

The Briggs Commission document from 1978.

"All to easily, the living experience of one generation can become hollow and second-hand form for the next. Warning that there is a danger in our denominational life (English Baptist) of holding to out-dated structures and practices. We have to accept that some of our churches are open to the criticism that they have become closed in outlook, backward-looking, concerned to maintain a legacy from the past in terms of church plant and former glories, uncertain how to throw off the shackles of yesterday in giving themselves in totality to the mission of today".

McBeth, Baptist Heritage, 508.

The Perfect Israel

2006-09-06T11:19:00.000-07:00

I am beginning to see a pattern in each of the prolegomena's (introductions) of the Gospel records. Perhaps, I am really just behind the curve in my Biblical-theological analysis, and if so point in the way to more rich "nuggets" from reading the Bible 'biblical-theologically' or perhaps I should say "redemptive historically".
The pattern that I am beginning to see is just how significant the prolegomena's are to understanding the Author's purpose behind his entire record. I am still wrestling with the idea of Jesus being the "true Israel" and what that really means for the rest of my scriptural understanding (Kingdom, eschatological motifs etc.). John's Gospel seems to overwhelm me at this time with the notion of Jesus being the "true and complete Israel". This wrestling is only within the first few chapters of John's Gospel too! (Note: Matthew's agenda seems to be like minded with John only in a different manner)

Take a look at how I see the prolegomena and tell me if I am justified in this thought process (atleast perhaps somewhat?) or not.

(1:14-18) The particulars within the paragraph, in light of the whole context of the prolegomena, are (1) John's return to the use of "Word" as the desriptive of Jesus from 1:1 demonstrating redemptive historical continuity with the previous "word" from God to Israel, namely the Mosaic law; (2) the emphasis on God dwelling with the disciples in the flesh, which enabled them to actually see the glory of God unlike Moses who at Sinai was not allowed to see God (Ex. 33:20 cf. Jn1:18) and (3) the superiority of the grace of God made known in Jesus Christ as juxtaposed to the grace of God disclosed through the 'incomplete' mosaic legislation (Deut. 18:18-19 cf. Deut. 30:5-10).
The heart of the pericope seems to be that John wants his readers to know that Jesus exceeds and transcends all redemptive historical expectations of the Messiah. Jesus is not just an Israelite who can figuratively be adopted by God and called a Son, rather he is the true Israelite, the Son of God from the Father, full of grace and truth (Jn. 1:14).

Jesus the True Israel and implications thereof?

Grace is indeed Irresistible

2006-09-01T11:14:00.000-07:00

I hope you enjoy the beauty of SOVEREIGN GRACE and if you do not perhaps after this historic testimony you will.

"In January 1688, Elias Keach formed the Pennepek church with twelve members; this was the first surviving Baptist church in the Middle Colonies. It is still active in Lower Dublin, a suburb of Philadelphia. Keach was a son of the London Baptist pastor, Benjamin Keach. Young Keach arrived in America in 1687, not yet a professing Christian. He was described [us Calvinists' will love this!!] as an exceedingly wild spark and a 'stranger to divine grace'. For whatever motive, he dressed like a clergyman, waring a 'band', and was invited to preach at a Baptist gathering near Philadelphia. He had heard his father often enough that giving a sermon was no great problem. However, [and the Calvinists' sing, "And oh the glories of the cross..."] in the midst of his sermon Keach was seized by the enormity of his sin. He stopped speaking and began to tremble [irresistible Grace baby! Jn. 10:14-16; 17:12; 6:39]. Keach's hearers thought some illness has come upon him. He confessed [Jn. 17:6-10] his deception and begged their forgiveness. He also was soundly converted [Acts 16:14]-under his own preaching! He later received baptism from Elder Dungan as Cold Spring".

Blessed be Your name O God!

[Text: H. Leon McBeth, The Baptist Heritage, (Broadman Heritage: Nashville), 145.

[Painting: The Conversion of Saint Paul by Parmingianino (1503-1540)]

"Of Making Many Books There is No End"

2006-08-24T15:51:00.000-07:00

This post is in connection to Mihilis and Baylor who are my friends...at times.

1. One book that changed your life: I know that this will be certainly weird, but Shepherding a Childs Heart by Tedd Tripp. If Websites were up for grabs I would say DGM.Org ever since I stumbled upon it when I was a 2nd semester Freshman at NBBC.

2. One book that you've read more than once: Biblical Separation, by Ernest Pickering (I know I'm sorry, really, I'm sorry).

3. One book you'd want on a desert island: Bible (ESV/NIV depends what mood I was in the day that I wound up on a desert Island). If Bible does not count I would want Desiring God.

4. One book that made you laugh: Mark Twain's, A Murder, A Mystery and A Marriage. Had I actually read it, I would probably have put Dave Hunts, "What Love is This"

5. One book that made you cry: Absolutely Free! By Zane Hodges. Another would be "The Spiritual Life of Theological students by B.B. Warfield.

6. One book you wish had been written: Tuesdays with Adam Thomas. You know, a book about my worldly wisdom kind of Solomon like. Someone needs to chronicle my journey and milk my thoughts.

7. One book you wish had never been written: Biblical Separation (and all look alikes)

8. One book you're currently reading: Give Praise to God (Ryken, Thomas (not adam) and Duncan).

9. One book you've been meaning to read: Lectures on Calvinism By, Abraham Kuyper

10. Tag 5 others: I only have 5 friends and they tagged me.

11. Name one book you've read that really sucked: Again, Biblical Separation ( and all look alikes).

Good day to all.

Biblical Theology

2006-08-21T17:57:00.000-07:00

I know that this book is not new and some of you probably already have it, but I needed to alert all who frequent this sight about it. It has been updated from the cover you see here and published through Soli Deo Gloria. It's subtitle is "The History of Theology from Adam to Christ". The work is an overview of the history of God's people through successive covenants which were established by God for his people. Monergism.com has the book and it is also highlighted in this months, absolutely sweet, TableTalk issue from Ligonier Ministries (my boy Sproul). The ISBN 1877611832 page amount is 911.

All must get this! Ok, maybe not all, but most, that is, after I get it.

Just a heads up. Mihilis and Baylor, I am coming with my "tag" post next.

Almost Riddle Like

2006-08-19T08:45:00.000-07:00

In considering the journey of faith, both that of mine and those of whom are recorded within redemptive history, I am constantly being struck with a sense of enigma. That is to say, the journey of faith is somewhat inexplicable or almost cryptic in a way. I am constantly being confronted with a type of "win-loss" strategy from Scripture. Consider the idea that EVERYTHING connected to Christ is gained through loss. That is, if I am to gain Christ himself then I am to lose everything that I hold as gain (Phil 3.8). Is it not almost paradoxical to forsake things of value in order to gain valuables? Think of how suffering is gain? Is not suffering demeritorious almost, but yet without it you cannot see Christ? Better yet, we are to consider it meritorious when we suffer since through its taking from us we are actually gaining (Phil 1.29).

Redemptive history speaks of Abraham forsaking all that he had and experientially knew for something that he had never seen. I mean he left everything he had and left for a city "not knowing where he was going" (Heb 11.8). Moses also considered demeritorious reproach as wealth (Heb. 11.26). I mean, do you see the dilemma? The entire redemptive historical story, including your part is a paradox, that is, gain through losing is the story.

How then is the paradox destroyed and the beauty of the story revealed? Suggestions? (fear not I have my own, the right one of course:).

Taking A Bat to the Beehive

2006-08-14T18:02:00.000-07:00

A NOTE TO THE READER:

I have recently caught wind of a bit of a rustling taking place due to the previous post. I must say, I am bit taken back from the notion that the idea of some of us younger men taking decidedly different approach in our futures than that of our pasts is coming to so many as a surprise?

Anyway, I say that to say this, I think that I speak for all (friends of like "faith" in the matter) when I say that we are not meaning to blatantly disrespect any one particular person, institution, or ministry with our comments (unless otherwise noted). Rather, this forum is an assumed context of jest, sobriety, devotion and scholarship. It is however, up to the reader often times to discern and decide which is which and when. That is, genre identification becomes significant in blogging (Note:The last post was not totally in Jest, this is for sure!)

This forum amongst friends, and sometimes others, is however, certainly open to "lockerroom" brawls and out and out "knock-down-dragout" fights since, once again, that is the assumed context!

Finally, here's to more bloggin' trouble, "CHEERS"!

Separating from Separating

2006-08-08T16:05:00.000-07:00

I know that for many of you, well, for all of you ( I think anyway) the philosophical (some dare to even say "doctrinal") position known as "Separation" among evangelical brothers is far from receiving your attention at this point in your thinking. That distance of thought is what I would like to encourage all the more. I am not trying to instigate a debate over the 50's and all that took place between the Fundamentalist and according to Ian Murray, Billy Graham (Referring to his book Evangelicalism Divided). That is not the day in which we live. There is a new horizon with which we need to be concerned. This new horizon is rarely, if EVER, addressed without an appeal to the 50's! Worse yet, the exegetical witness is not there for someone to defend separation from conservative evangelical brethren. It is not there. Not there.

On a historical level the Fundamentalists have been battling the Southern Baptists for many years over what now is true HISTORY. It is now a terrible rumor to say that the SBC aligns itself with a liberal agenda through cooperative financial effort. The data is not there. Not there. So, why are the fundamentalists "separating" from them again?

Falacious too, is the idea that the Fundamentalists are somehow abidig by Paul's admonition to "mark and avoid" certain brothers by not sharing pulpits or classrooms but none-the-less commending one another to the doctrinally disordered brother's literature on Godliness, Systematic Theo, Devotional material etc. I do not think that that is a proper application to the Apostle's warnings. Well, I know its not.

Anyway, I just thought that I would pass that little tidbit along so as to make sure that we are all on the same page. And better yet, if not we could contend for the unity of the body against all rivals.

I assume the separatist ship has sailed and none of you are on it. If you are still however on the shore and considering it, DON'T. It's not really there.

Finally, I hope you love the irony of how I am separating from separating. Get it? Oh well.

The bondage to Self-Love

2006-08-04T16:08:00.000-07:00

Do you subscribe to Tabletalk Magazine? If not, you should. Tabletalk is a monthly magazine from Ligonier Ministries that engages both the mind and heart. You can almost hear the RTS slogan in each article ("A Mind for Truth a Heart for God"- a personal favorite of mine).

I say all that to say this, last night I was smitten while I sat and read the introductory article to this months issue entitled, "Exceptional Mediocrity". The article is about how mediocrity is not something that ought to have ANY part in the Christian experience. In some sense Paul might even say let this "not even be named among you". Sproul writes,

"The legitimate motive for excellence is to seek achievement for the end to glorify God. That is the chief purpose for which we are created, to bear witness to His glory. One thing that does not bear witness to the glory of God is a human addiction to mediocrity, a smug satisfaction with the status quo" (TT pg7).

As I read that I could not help but to think that each and everyone of the theologians that I lean on, look up to, somewhat "idolize" or perhaps have a fascination with all have had the same current running through their veins. That is, they all worked hard (1 Cor. 15.10). I was confronted with the fact that doing theology and loving God is not easy and toilless. Rather, there is much labor to be done and work to be performed. I was so rebuked by Sproul's admonition and yet greatly encouraged and set aflame. I have much work to do but the work MUST be done.
I was admonished also that, "No one achieves excellence in any worthy enterprise without diligent and disciplined labor" (can you hear Edwards' "Resolved" list in that?). Is not the glory of the cross a "worthy enterprise" and does it not draw me unto labor?

Finally, Sproul wrote these inflamatory words, "Let us therefore seek to excel, let us push ourselves to the highest limits of endurance to achieve the highest possible level of excellence in all that we do, while at the same time watching vigilantly for the evil impulse of pride to vitiate any value to our labor. Let us work hard, let us excel to God's glory. Soli Deo Gloria."

Brothers, hate your self-love and keep working.

An Enjoyable Theological Commentary

2006-07-28T16:13:00.000-07:00

Recently, I have been reading Herman Ridderbos' theological commentary on John's Gospel. I would highly recommend it to my fellow classmates and other advanced theological students. Ridderbos taught for years at the Reformed Churches of the Netherlands in Kampen (NT department). The book is certainly scholarly and focused upon the meaning/message of John's Gospel. Thus, less time is spent on text, source, and compositional critical issues in exchange for a more theologically driven pursuit.

I have enjoyed it so far. Perhaps I have given him some benefit of the doubt on some matters based upon my appreciation of his other work I read entitled, "Redemptive History and the New Testament Scriptures", another book that I would recommend on Canon and its theological significance. Anyway, perhaps you will find this tid-bit interesting, if not, well then, click on something else for now.

Why Seminary or Even Studies at All?

2006-07-24T15:59:00.000-07:00

Ahhhhh...Blogging. Well I am trying to return back from my work and homework schedule of the summer months it has been hecktick to say the least. But I have returned with something on my mind. Oh yea, something has actually been on my mind and I am READY to say it (as if you care, right).

Anyway, I find myself thinking again and again about how it is that EVERYONE is an expert in theology/Bible? I mean it is baffling to me as to why churches demand that men who desire the office of a Bishop spend some difficult time and money to go and STUDY the Bible? I mean, it was not so much a mystery to me until I began to actually do it. Ya know, go to a Bible College graduate and then move to a Seminary to further study the text of Scripture under difficult circumstances and so on and so forth. Now I am into my fourth (and final) year of Seminary and I learning that nearly everyone who does not go to seminary or perhaps even Bible college is convinced that they understand, perceive, discern, and perhaps even know just as much if not more than I ( and other seminary/theological students).

I know this because biblical conversations over somewhat "controversial" subjects (calvinism, liberty issues, service types etc.) usually end up having a layperson say, "well, I think", or "It seems to me", or better yet he says, "That's not true". I mean, why do many churches insist upon having men go to seminary for TRAINNING if in the end every Tom, Dick and Harry know just as much, or even more than the Pastor? See what I am saying? What is the point of extended study for a pastor from a lay person's perspective if he already thinks he understands the issues better, is more discerning or even knows just as much as his Pastor or those studying to become Pastors?

Please do not misunderstand I am not saying that only the "professionals" can understand the Bible. However, I am arguing that they do know more than the average congregant. We demand this of them! Right? I mean, they study it more than the average trade worker, golfer, engineer etc. Right? They have been called to and have spend time daily working and laboring at their task. So I ask you why is there so much resistance and posturing when it comes to learning from men who honestly love God and want to continue his work in the body of Christ?

I know that I need to clarify some of my thoughts. I look forward to your responses. Perhaps I have ranted without context? Do you feel me?

What a Friend indeed

2006-06-25T12:06:00.000-07:00

I just thought that I would pass on a simple, yet magnificantly profound, truth that was a great source of enrichment to me spiritually today. Today during the worship service a woman sang "What a friend we have in Jesus". She sang the song with such convincing sincerity that I could hardly resist my tears.
I quickly found myself reflecting upon the reality that when I am "weak and heavy laden, cumbered with a load of care" I have a gloriously real "precious Savior, [who is] still our refuge [and I can] take it to the Lord in prayer". I then wanted to scream to myself, "Adam!" "Why?" "Why do I not take it to the Lord in prayer?" For "In His arms he'll take and shield me-Take it to the Lord in prayer".
Again, I had to rebuke myself with the truth of, "O what peace I often forfeit, O what needless pain I bear, All because I do not carry EVERYTHING to God in prayer". I mean, "who will all my sorrows share? Jesus knows my every weakness-Take it to the Lord in prayer".

As this women sang to encourage the faint-hearted I found myself oddly refreshed while being altogether rebuked. So, it is I find with the merciful hand of God, He remembers our frame and that we are but dust (Ps. 103.10-14). Jesus my merciful Savior is also my truest friend. Praise be to God.

What SAY You???

2006-06-18T17:30:00.000-07:00

Am I just absolutely missing it? Or perhaps, I am losing my mind and any amount of theological discernment, which the good Lord bestowed upon me, no matter how small the actual bestowment was?
I say that to say, I am getting exhausted with fighting ridiculous wars. Ok, maybe not 'wars' per-se, but awkward confrontations none-the-less.
What's the battle (or confrontation) you ask? Inerrancy? Imputation? The deity of Jesus the Son? NO! I wish! The confrontation is over simple terminology and choices in vocabulary. No, I am not talking about @#$% or anything of the sort, at least not in my mind anyway. Rather, I am talking about TULIP. In that, I am not even suggesting that you must believe all aspects of TULIP in every way, shape or form, but I am suggesting that TULIP ought to no longer be considered to be synonomous with the unpardenable sin!

I am arguing for a reenlistment of basic terms that enable us, and have enabled God's people for centuries, to understand propositions of Scripture in an orderly and profitable fashion. For many of us, this is simply called Systematic Theology! It has been a beloved practice of the church since its birth in Acts!

Why then, (if this is so beloved) can some say that 'I use only biblical terms' and with that treat you as though you are being unbiblical (nearly ungodly) in your theological statements and therefore rendering you as irresponsible in your handling of the holy Scriptures? It is also spun that those who are challenging the reenlistment of TULIP are self-serving and or arrogant. This MUST stop!
The same folks that say to only use biblical terms also encourage, yea, preach, the need for systematic theology! Sometimes, I wish I could ask, "Is there ever a mention of the word systematic in the Scriptures?" I do not recall (correct me if I am wrong) of there ever being an admonition for a systematic ordering of Scripture at ALL or by ANY given author? So, I ask you, how can systematic terms, which have been proven to be brilliantly potent for the sake of the church for literally hundreds of years be cast aside, so too those who use them be cast aside, by the same men who claim to "cherish" the Systematic treatment and understanding of Scripture?

For example, the words "systematic" and "unconditional election" are both extra biblical terms employed by the church for the sake of understanding propositions within the holy Scriptures in a discernable and orderly fashion. How then is it that we can so easily choose one to be rendered a blessing (the word and idea of 'systematic') and the other (unconditional election) nearly to be damning (in the context of public teaching)?

In sum, I find this subjective selectivity of "ok" theological terminology to be utterly maddening! Either I am losing my mind or, well, I'm right, and that would be aaaaaallright.

Can I get a witness?

Update On Detroit Playaz'

2006-06-10T17:42:00.000-07:00

Sorry for all of you who might read this blog periodically and are not from Detroit so, quite frankly could not possibly care any less about Detroit sports, but I have to give a shout out to my detroit playaz'. I mean, the Pistons went down in a sort of "crash and burn" fashion (as Chris Bruno mentioned (CRBlog) and then the Wings were really no different, doing pretty much the same thing. However, the Tigers, who are really Detroits last option for sports glamour (the Lions actually might take that one. I don't really know, they both have really stunk for years) is now the ONLY Detroit story going on! Featured here is Marcus Thames, who currently is the Left fielder for the Tigers (I think, I have to listen to the games on the internet, its one down side to living in VB) and he is playing RED HOT. He is hitting 11 hiome runs in his last 127 at bats including 9 in his last 23! The guy is a playa'! Although the Tigs only got 2 hits against the BlueJays this afternoon the 2 they got counted. Both hits were home runs, and my man Thames smacked one of them! Currently the Tigs have more wins than anyone else in the 'bigs'. So, I say, play on playa'!

"Sell all that you have and give it to the Poor"

2006-06-03T06:56:00.000-07:00

I was reading the latest issue of "CT" (Christianity Today) and I came across an article entitled, "Rock Un-Solid" (p65). The article is about "Christian" rock bands that are struggling to make it in the "real band" world. That is to say, Godless rock bands are the only "real" bands that exist according to these...might I say, Punks. The article captures the much shared sentiment among "cross-over" bands, which is "We're Christians, but we're not a Christian band", to which I respond than you are NOT Christians.

At stake here, in my mind anyway, is whether or not a Christian can at anytime or in any situation be anything other than a Christian!? I mean c'mon! Did not Christ extend a much more deadly message than, "We're Christians, but we're not a Christian band"? Christ's message was one of bidding us unto death. For he would say, "Follow me, and leave the dead to bury their own dead" (Mtt 8:22). Consider also, "If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple" (Lk 14:26ff).

The article surrounds mainly a band by the name "Mute Math". The keyboardist and cofounder Paul Meany is quoted as saying, "I had no desire to be the Christian version of a real band". This punk, who used the Christian community as a starting point to get his little quasi rock band going, goes on to say, "We wanted total mainstream credibility, and then to have it sold back into the Christian market if it were successful in the mainstream" (quotes from p63).

So I ask you, is this Christian? Can the individuals that make up "Mute Math" call themselves Christ's disciples at all, though they claim the name of Christian? They say that they are Christians, but I say that Christ's message of what that means has been monumentally unnoticed or sinfully ignored. This is not the markings of Christianity!

Finally, I would say that if you (anyone, including Mute Math) have not been found to hate your music for Christ's sake than you are not a partaker of his covenant. This message might seem harsh, but I think that all ought to seriously consider it. May we never be a bunch of Joel Osteens', but rather biblical Christians despising this worlds glamour for the sake of a better and far more lasting Kingdom.

Mother, Mother Ocean!

2006-05-29T13:07:00.000-07:00

Though I surely do not embrace the Buffet lifestyle I must admit that today I felt a bit 'buffetesque', if you will. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with what I am referring too, if so do not feel embarassed, knowledge of buffet is not neccessarily a point of boasting for myself either (not to place blame upon anyone for my Buffet knowledge or anything, but it is completely and utterly my dear friend Doug Anderson's fault). But anyway, I must say looking into the beautiful Atlantic for the last three days, as My wife and I enjoy this long American celebratory weekend I couldn't help but to hum the Buffet song Mother Mother Ocean: (hmm...hmmm...hmm... that's me humming):

Mother, mother ocean, I have heard you call,
Wanted to sail upon your waters
since I was three feet tall.
You've seen it all, you've seen it all.
Watch the men who rode you,
Switch from sails to steam.
And in your belly you hold the treasure
that few have ever seen, most of them dreams,
Most of them dreams.

Ok, Ok, I know that I am cheesy standing out there, in my less than picturesque-self (none-speedo wearing atleast) looking into God's glorious creation and humming a Buffet cartoon style song. But hey, I really enjoyed moment of humor and child-like reflection on the great sea. I guess this points, once again, to the fact that I certainly can't take myself too seriously.

And oh yea, you shouldn't take yourself so seriously either.

Enjoy the comedic gesture even if its not quite that:)

Reading Genesis

2006-05-27T06:24:00.000-07:00

I have recently been abscent from blogging since the reading for my summer course has been assigned. I have been reading "How to Read Genesis" by Tremper Longman III for the last week. I thought that I would offer a brief review for your pleasure, or perhaps for your annoyance, but a brief review none-the-less.

For the Layman:
The book was enjoyable. It is quite brief (only 173 pgs) and yet nicely informative. I would encourage anyone who is going to read Genesis through for their study time to pick up a copy. It was $9.17 on walmart.com and for that price it is WELL worth it. Longman is helpful in breaking down the basic concepts which form the entire book of Genesis. He is very readable and easily followed (I imagine) for the non-technical student (i.e. non-seminarian). In sum, I think that you would find the book to be worth its weight in teaching you the basic elements of Genesis so that your reading of the holy text will be rich and full.

For the Seminarian:
All the above stated info immediately applies. However, I also think that you would enjoy the appendix section. He offers his perspective on the best Genesis commentaries and he writes a brief comment on each to tell you the theological perspective of the author who wrote the commentary. Perhaps for that alone you would want the book, because DO NOT think that you can just barrow my copy and look at the commentary recomendation, no, no, no! Just-kidding of course, but really I think that it would be worth the $9.17 to buy the book.

In sum, for you the book will probably serve you best in teaching a course on Genesis in your church; this text would nicely suppliment your thoughts.

Sadly, No more 'Rockin' On

2006-05-17T17:08:00.000-07:00

I know that some of you might think of me as a bit of a hypocrite with this post. I will concede to the fact that, yes, it is true I have a smidgin' of a willful blindspot theologically when it comes to my pragmatic love for Petra Praise. Arminian, yes most surely. Authentic CCM'rs, quite likely. Encouraging while listening...Absolutely! I mean, if you have not heard "Lovely Lord" (track 10) by Petra you are in need of repentance! Not to say anything of track 9 entitled, "I waited for the Lord"! Petra can rock like no one else when it comes to 80's style Christian Rock. Yes, you read it right, I said it, Christian Rock!

In a bit of a confession here I must say that I have need every once in a while to just 'let my hair down', if you will, and rock it out by means of blaring my boys album Petra Praise 2. Love it!

Anyway, I must unfortunately announce to any who have not heard that Petra will no longer be rockin' after 33 hard fought years in the "CCM" movement. God has been good to Petra and touched many lives through their music. So, if you ever feel the need to rock it out, find Petra Praises 2 the album and, as Lynnard Skynard would say, "turn it up!"

Thanks for 33 years of rockin' it out for the sake of the Kingdom Petra. We'll be seein' ya.

Pursuing Unity or Keeping "peace"?

2006-05-13T08:07:00.000-07:00

Thanks to my many friends who have offered much thought to my initial questions regarding Christian liberality. I do not wish to leave the initial discussion too early however, I do wish to build upon it.

Paul speaks to the Christian community in Ephesus in terms of "walking worthily", which is demonstrated in "humility", "gentleness", "patience", "bearing with one another", and being "EAGER TO MAINTAIN the UNITY in the bond of peace" (4:1-3). The faith community is to "speak the truth in love" as we are growing up in every way into him who is the head, that is, Christ (4:15). This type of Christ-ian living "makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love" (4:16).

When I examine the body consciousness of Paul I am doubtful that we are truly honoring the explicit teaching of Christian unity. That is to say, I reject the notion that pursuing (actively maintaining) unity is accomplished by simply co-existing with other brothers and sisters through a 'don't ask don't tell' policy. How is that receiving me and I receiving you? If we cannot know much about one another with regards to our lives lived out in faith, then we fail to authentically know one another at all, and thus are failing to receive one another in love. A 'don't ask don't tell' Christianity fails to demonstrate "humility", "patience", "bearing with one another" and most all fails to demonstrate authentic love. We are all very familiar with vague references to "loving" brothers and sisters that we do not agree with, but what does that mean? Or moreover, what does that look like?

In sum, I stating that we are not truly unified at all if we do not even know one another. I am not saying that we must bear all things, but lets face it, who we are in our homes is who we are and how we can be prayed for. Therefore, it is unchristian to keep the peace over and against pursuing peace, of which we are unfortunately unaccustomed too.

Why Do You Despise Your Brother? Rom 14:10

2006-05-10T16:16:00.000-07:00

Recently I have been wrestling with concepts of "Christian liberty". That is, how do we as brothers and sisters in Christ live in peace with one another, loving one another without passing judgment upon one another when it comes to living out our personal lives in faith before God(Read Romans 14-15)? I care to cite only four of thousands of "issues" within the Christian community; Movies, Drinking (responsibily), Smoking, and Music. I know, I know, the list thing is scaring you about right now, since it eerily reminds you of Camp, but fear not, I am no evangelist and I am certainly not going to ask you to bow your heads and raise your guilty little hands! No, I really mean it. How do we co-exist with one another in love, not pretend "I love you" gestures either! I mean, really love one another, which includes accepting one another without ANY despising (Rom. 14:10-12).

I could go all night, and I mean alllllllll night, on debating what is a sin and what is not, but that is not my point. Rather, I want us to dialogue on how we can express love, true genuine biblical love, toward one another when we do not share the same conscience within the realm of "liberty". That is to say, if you enjoy an ice cold Bud after work, and is sanctified through faith and prayer than I want to rejoice with you, as someone I love and for whom Christ has died. I mean it! And I also want to rejoice (and despise NOT) in my brothers who cannot in faith drink an ice cold Bud after work, but think that God would rather have them drink an ice cold Pepsi (not Coke though, that's just...hmmm...not fitting):).

In sum, I hope to encourage you to think through these "issues". Those who are "strong" in faith cannot despise the "weak" (or those who simply are different in conscience than you) and those who are "weak" must not despise the "strong" (or those who simply are different in conscience than you) otherwise, we do not love the elect for whom Christ died and that is an offense none of us can rightfully continue in.

There will be more on this in future posts, but I really just want to share my initial thoughts with you and I hope to challenge you and be challenged by you. This is no exposition of Rom 14-15 nor was it meant to be. If this is too elementary for you than sorry, but I am thinking about this a lot, especially in concert to future ministry.

"Friends I've Never Met" - Part II

2006-05-03T16:19:00.000-07:00

Charles Hodge was a masterful systematic theologian. His life's work was much consumed by a strong presentation and defense of the mighty doctrines of grace. When american students talk of Calvinism they are speaking the language of exemplary men like Charles Hodge. History speaks of him as possessing a vigorous intellectual mind for truth coupled with a heart for God. His influence was immense. He enjoyed a distinguished fifty year tenure at College of New Jersey (now Princeton). During that time he is said to have taught nearly 3,000 ministerial students! Dr. Hodge was a scholar of scholars and we are truly indebted to his mind and minstry.

His Sytematic Theology is now sold in a 3vol set with a three part division (Vol 1) Theology, (Vol 2) Anthropology and (Vol 3 ) Soteriology. This set is worth possessing for all theological students.

Charles Hodge certainly is a friend that I have never met, but a friend none-the-less.

Phil. 2:29-30 "...hold men like him in high regard...for the work of Christ" (men of godly service)

"Do You Really Mean It?"

2006-04-30T19:49:00.000-07:00

I am, as so are many of you, fresh off of the T4G Conference. The conference was everything that I was anticipating it to be. I must say that the entire conference made me feel like the Norman Rockwell painting entitled, "I will do my best" (placed here for your viewing pleasure) in a certain way. That is, I felt like standing and making a pledge (or "cutting a covenant" if you prefer biblical terminology) with each speaker as they confessed Christ and admonished me to fight the good fight for the glory of God and the Church which is his body. R.C. Sproul was one such speaker who God used to both reprove and encourage me. He made it painfully clear that it is one thing to "believe", defend and proclaim justification by faith alone and it is totally another to "have it in your blood"! As R.C. spoke I was stunned at my own lack of faith in Christ's justifying work of grace. I was also strenghtened with that same sense of awe; God is marvelous and exceedingly kind.

Piper was certainly a spiritual "highlight" if I could phrase it in such terms. He brought a sense of blood earnestness that only Piper could do. What more can I say than, you know, Piper. His Godward sobriety puts all who stand in the pulpit nearly to shame. Even Ligon Duncan acknowledged that much during the answer and question time (who I might add was quite remarkable himself while preaching the whole Bible as Christian Scripture).

I must say this, each scholar represented (Sproul, Dever, Duncan, MacArthur, Piper, Mohler) had a pastoral heart and concern. Each referred to the joy of the pastorate as joy which cannot be experienced elsewhere. I found that humbling and encouraging.

Finally, the most "Rockwell" moment for me (and others I'm sure) was when Piper spoke to the "men in their twenties". He spoke of the current church with a pessimistic tone however, he spoke of the future generation with optimism, with reference to our theology. He said that he is seeing a trend in "little pockets" everywhere of men who love the glory of God. As he explained he said, "let me be clear" I mean "calvinism". Then he went on to add that worship is fueled by theology and admonished us to keep going. Perhaps now, you can most rightly understand how I felt like the boys in the Rockwell painting. I wanted to stand and tell each man, who commended himself to me through speaking at this conference, "I'll do my best". Specifically, John Piper I hear you loud and clear and "yes" I will continue to stand by the Spirits power for the glory of God in the Gospel!
Brothers, we must teach and preach calvinism, that is the articulation of the Gospel revealed in Scripture.

" God is the Gospel" T4G

2006-04-25T04:59:00.000-07:00

Yes, you have read my title right, I did steal it from John Piper. I am preparing to leave this morning after my counseling exam for Louisville, KY in order to be at the "Together for the Gospel" conference, where I will be able to hear some of my "friends I've never met" (Scroll down to see series part one- Van Til), of perhaps most importantly is John Piper. I am greatly anticipating this trip, my friend Dan Valentine and I bought tickets last April, so as you can imagine we are ready to go.

I am perhaps most excited about the conference because of the statement being publically made. That is, I find great encouragement in the fact that the "reformed" gospel (not to say that there is any other) is being promoted between brothers of faith over and against more minor elements of faith and practice (i.e. denominational boundaries, eschatology etc.). Now, I know that for some of you I am going to have to "give an account" for some of the undefined statements that I have just made, but that will have to wait. I am leaving. I will look forward to interacting with everyone's thoughts about the conference when I get back. In the words of Bill O'reilly, "Until next time America".

Both The Rebuke and The Encouragement Are Free

2006-04-21T17:43:00.000-07:00

"The principle charge against the human race, the world's deepest guilt, the all-inclusive cause of judgment, is idolatry." -Tertullian, Early Latin Theology, text: Idolatry pg83.

I find this so very true, unfortunately, within my own heart. Outside the comedic relief of Michael Scott at the "Office" arogance is ugly. May God wash it from us.

I will bless you with the words whereby I was blessed. The words of Saint Augustine:

"Stand with him and you will stand firmly rooted. Rest in him and you will have true rest. Why do you continue to go along these rough paths? Where are you going? The good things that you love come from him, and as long as the good is from him, it is good and enjoyable. But it will justly become bitter if that which comes from his is loved instead of him. Why then do you continue to walk farther and farther along these difficult and wearying paths? There is no rest where you are searching for it. It is right that you should seek rest, but the rest is not to be found where you are seeking it. You are looking for a pleasant life in the land of death, but it is not to be found there. How can there be a happy life where there is no life at all?

Our True Life came down to earth, and bore our death. He slew our death out of the abundance of his own Life. He thundered forth, and cried out to usto return with him to that secret place from which he had come forth to us."

Augustine's Confessions, pg 29

Be Blessed Brothers

"The Pure Joy of Rediculous Arrogance"

2006-04-20T18:59:00.000-07:00

The office was halarious tonight. The best comment of perhaps the entire season took place tonight. I hope that you did not miss it. After Michael beat up Dwight he restored him to fellowship by quasi-promoting him from "Assistant TO the Manager" to (a pretend) "Assistant Manager" position. Dwight responded to the promotion as a child who receives his first bike. It was awesome!
Michael went on to talk about the event as though he was (of course) the greatest person that ever lived because he did that for Dwight after beating him up at lunch. At the close of the show Micheal looked into the camera and rhetorically said, "Do I want people to fear me or love me? That's easy, both." Then, with great dramatic skill as to conclude the matter he said, "I want people to fear how much they love me."
I'm sorry, but folks, that is pure genius! Michael rules! Of course, in his own rediculous way that is.

"Evolution, the Gospel of Judas and the Indians"

2006-04-15T10:11:00.000-07:00

I have recently been reading through 2Cor. As a result I have been struck in my "inner man" with the stewardship of reconciliation, which has been graciously given me. My framing crew is steeped in depravity, each day demonstrating a total disregard, of which I would deem hatred, for God.
Thursday at work I tried to take the message of reconciliation to my boss as we worked side by side all day. I was quickly reminded of Paul's total context where he writes, "Who is sufficient for these things"? I tried to engage him with a heart of sincerity speaking the words of Christ with affectionate love. However, I began to be discouraged. My boss was, once again, referring to evolution, the Gospel of Judas, and the American Indians as proof to why all religion is insufficient. His approach was that since God, (if there is one) did not create mankind then he has no "right" to "be so assumptious" as to say that "all men would reject him" if he showed himself to them. I proceeded to demonstrate that since God did make all men it is nothing of the assumptious sort for God to know all men including their hatred of him.

When I asked him about his perspective on the words of Jesus in the NT he quickly referred to the new "Gospel of Judas" as proof positive that conspiracy does exist! Therefore, no Gospel, NT or otherwise is "purely authentic". When I pushed him on the words of Jesus being that, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life, no one comes but by me" he responded, "so your telling me that everyone without Jesus is completey @&$%-ed!" To which I kindly, but forcefully retorted, "YES", that is what He is saying. My boss quickly brought up the American Indians and how God is utterly infair and not loving if he would send men who have not had a chance to know him to hell. His estimation was that if God is a human God, then it is certainly unfair of him to send people to hell if they have not heard of Jesus! I responded, like any good calvinist would, Who are you O' Man!

For the sake of not wearing you out with this story I will cut the blog short here and just say two last things: (1) We must be aware of these present day attacks upon the bible. I know, I know, it is not completely worth all of our efforts, but hey, My boss only pursued formal education through highschool (barely) and he is fully aware and capable of interacting with current issues and debate, (2) We must witness to those who God has brought upon us, but how? It is a challenge in real life to engage dead men with a living Gospel, we must utterly pray for these individuals and pray specifically that God will unleash his sovereign grace upon them and "irresistably" arrest their souls. This is the ministry of reconciliation, "who is sufficient for these things"?

Have you any edifying witness experiences for me?

Tigers on a Role!

2006-04-12T10:42:00.000-07:00

Tigers first baseman Chris Shelton was named AL Player of the Week! This is quite a stride within the Tigers organization! The "Tigs" are off to a great start this year. Maybe, just maybe we'll go to the post season! Today they continue their series with defending world champs Chicago White Sox. If they win today they will tie the series up to 1-1.

Chris Shelton joined Lou Brock and Barry Bonds as the only players to homer five times through the first four games of a season and for that I say, play-on playa'!

"Be Eager to Maintain the Unity" (Eph 4.3)

2006-04-10T16:55:00.000-07:00

Thank you to all who have asked about the visitors dinner at Westminster that my wife and I attended on Friday. I was able to share my concerns about covenant baptism (childhood) with the Pastor. The exchange was gracious and very Christian. I appreciated his kind and ecumenical spirit toward my doctrinal viewpoints. It was refreshing (and reassuring) to witness the unity of Christ's body at work between two brothers who share different viewpoints and convictions of doctrine. It is my conviction that among evangelical brothers mode of baptism is not an issue of separation! The Pastor and I share great fellowship around the doctrines of grace and all fundamental issues regarding the holy Scriptures.

From his standpoint (and rightfully so) I could not serve as either a Pastor or elder within the church until I was able to doctrinally embrace covenant baptism. However, all other avenues of ministry are openned to both my wife and I within the Westminster community. This is a Christian gesture of unity and for that I am greatful. Through this interdenominational experience I am learning and growing in what it means to be 'one new man' united in one Spirit having one Lord and yes, ONE baptism:) (Eph 2-4).
The pastor has found my theology and exegesis interesting enough to meet me for lunch to discuss Christian theology more, or perhaps to try and supplant me:). Either way, I am looking forward to it!
I will end with these thoughts; it refreshing to be united in ministry with other members of the body of Christ, for whom he died, united upon exactly that, his gospel. Might I also say, that it is great to enter a place of worship knowing that a great and LARGE God is going to be prayed to, preached, taught, sung, praised, and worshipped (i.e. Calvinism).

Thanks for listening.

2006-04-07T07:31:00.000-07:00

For anyone interested there is going to be a 20/20 "investigation" into to the "hidden history of Jesus" tonight. James Tabor performs some pseudoscience, writes a book and is ushered into the lime light. Agenda? Absolutely! In watching an interview with Tabor I heard him say that there was no way that Jesus could have been virgin born, because "it takes two sets of chromosomes". Since Tabor is working off of a typically depraved presuppositional foundation, he postulates that Jesus' father was a Roman soldier named, "Pantera" (No, not the Dallas based death exalting Rockband).

Thus, Jesus is emphatically not the Son of God or the child of Joseph. Tabor believes that what he has found destroys the traditional views of Christianity and presents a Jesus, who teaches much differently than the first century Christianity that spread abroad in his name. Of course there is also the other "new historical" find "The Gospel of Judas" which is another bit of pseudoscholarship/science. (More about this can be found on Almohler.com see my link over on right).

I think (don't hold me to it though) Carson is going to be a part of the "investigation" tonight on 20/20. They have selected him to, obviously, represent the orthodox scholarship, which is sweet because he is certainly up to the task!

It is true that whether all of this resurgence in the historical Jesus type of junk is annoying or not it, we must be ready to give an answer. Anyone up to going to see the DaVinci Code when it comes out?

Friends I've Never Met - Part 1

2006-04-05T19:43:00.000-07:00

The Promise is for you and your children?

2006-04-04T15:32:00.000-07:00

Recently I have been attending Westminster Reformed Presbyterian Church in Suffolk, Va. I have really enjoyed the worship and doctrinal atmosphere. I began attending because of the church's strong and public adherence to the Doctrines of Grace as articulated in the Westminster Catechism (longer and shorter). The worship style is blended and very gracious. The expository preaching has richly blessed not only myself, but my wife also. The pastor is a sharp guy (Westminster DMin) and presents studied material not personal issues. The church is Christ honoring and very refreshing! But................., I am struggling with their perspective on baptism (infants) and what that might mean for me as a member seeking out minstry within the body. My wife and I are going to the Pastors home this Friday for dinner and I will be able to cover this ground with him. However, here are some theological issues I would like to present.

As I understand it they articulate 3 "special" covenants in scripture. Those "special" covenants being, Abraham (Gen 12, 15, 17), Moses (Ex 19-24), and David (2 Sam 7, Ps 89, 132). Historically within these particular covenants both believers and unbelievers resided. Thus, a pattern throughout Scripture is that not everyone within the covenant community is regenerate.
Move forward into the context of the New Covenant community and you will also find that not all covenant members are regenerate Heb. 10:26-27; ("This verse is a warning to church members that are not true believers that they will be judged if they continue in their evil ways" - Richard Pratt). Notice also, Heb. 10:29-30 this suggests that "sanctified" is not to be confused with saved it is simply meaning "set apart" by the covenant.

I guess the view is this: Old Testament covenants included children (Gen 6:18; 17:17; Ex 20:5-6; Ps 132:11-12) and therefore the New Covenant includes children (Acts 2:38-39; 1 Cor 7:14).

Let me be clear! In no way does baptism include any element of salvation, in the sense that a child does not need to call upon Christ from their own faith. Rather, baptism is used to call children to faith just as circumcision called children in the Old Convenant to faith (Jer 4:4). Baptized children are called to make the outward sign an inward reality by trusting Christ.

Well, what do you say?
signed,
Struggling church member

2006-04-03T16:15:00.000-07:00

For all of you out there that appreciate good sarcastic dry humor the office BBC edition might be just what your looking for. However, it is a bit more off-color than its American counterpart in some spots. I rented it, so I did not have time to watch all of the episodes for season one, but what I saw I liked. The main boss in the English version is halarious! If you rent it make sure that you watch Episode 4 on season 1. It is sure to make you laugh! The boss revisits his rock and roll days in the office and it is completely obnoxious.

2006-04-02T16:23:00.000-07:00

I was recently reading the latest issue of Christianity Today and there was an article that caught my attention. The article was entitled, "The Conservative Humanist" and was written by Glenn T. Stanton, who works at Focus on the Family. No, the article is not a new Manifesto of sorts, but rather it serves as a call (general not effectual J/K) to evangelical Christians for rediscovery of "what it means to be human" (p44). He states, "True humanism will demolish our gnostic tendencies to believe in a small God who is only interested in our eternal destiny and our moral behavior" (p45).
I find myself in a very precarious position here; (1) I am in agreement (atleast in some respects) with someone at Focus on the Family and, (2) I am wondering about the accusation of us (evangelical Christians) being "on the verge of Gnosticism" with our concerns being purely in reference to the eternal/moral (small God?).

I guess the question I am asking is, "what does it mean to be human?" and what is my role (socially, politically, economically etc.)as a "new creature" among those who are still suffering the effects of the old creation (i.e. depraved)?

2006-03-31T14:09:00.000-08:00

I am looking forward to future blogging with much anticipation. However, right at this moment I am under the burden of two twin sister task masters, namely, a Biblical Theology of Ephesians (for my Greek Exegesis course), and an Exegetical Analysis Paper of Galatians 3 (for my exegetical Methods class). I say all of that to say this, I am too busy to mess with too much of this "blogging", however, you will hear from me,...oh yes friend, you WILL hear from me!